[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] char: ipmi: convert tasklets to use new tasklet_setup() API

[Allen]

> >
> > Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier at gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml at gmail.com>
>
> This looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard at mvista.com>
>
> Are you planning to push this, or do you want me to take it?  If you
> want me to take it, what is the urgency?

 Thanks. Well, not hurry, as long as it goes into 5.9 with all other
changes.


>
> -corey
>
> > ---
> >  drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 13 ++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> > index 737c0b6b24ea..e1814b6a1225 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
> >
> >  static struct ipmi_recv_msg *ipmi_alloc_recv_msg(void);
> >  static int ipmi_init_msghandler(void);
> > -static void smi_recv_tasklet(unsigned long);
> > +static void smi_recv_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t);
> >  static void handle_new_recv_msgs(struct ipmi_smi *intf);
> >  static void need_waiter(struct ipmi_smi *intf);
> >  static int handle_one_recv_msg(struct ipmi_smi *intf,
> > @@ -3430,9 +3430,8 @@ int ipmi_add_smi(struct module         *owner,
> >       intf->curr_seq = 0;
> >       spin_lock_init(&intf->waiting_rcv_msgs_lock);
> >       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&intf->waiting_rcv_msgs);
> > -     tasklet_init(&intf->recv_tasklet,
> > -                  smi_recv_tasklet,
> > -                  (unsigned long) intf);
> > +     tasklet_setup(&intf->recv_tasklet,
> > +                  smi_recv_tasklet);
> >       atomic_set(&intf->watchdog_pretimeouts_to_deliver, 0);
> >       spin_lock_init(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock);
> >       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&intf->xmit_msgs);
> > @@ -4467,10 +4466,10 @@ static void handle_new_recv_msgs(struct ipmi_smi *intf)
> >       }
> >  }
> >
> > -static void smi_recv_tasklet(unsigned long val)
> > +static void smi_recv_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
> >  {
> >       unsigned long flags = 0; /* keep us warning-free. */
> > -     struct ipmi_smi *intf = (struct ipmi_smi *) val;
> > +     struct ipmi_smi *intf = from_tasklet(intf, t, recv_tasklet);
> >       int run_to_completion = intf->run_to_completion;
> >       struct ipmi_smi_msg *newmsg = NULL;
> >
> > @@ -4542,7 +4541,7 @@ void ipmi_smi_msg_received(struct ipmi_smi *intf,
> >               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->xmit_msgs_lock, flags);
> >
> >       if (run_to_completion)
> > -             smi_recv_tasklet((unsigned long) intf);
> > +             smi_recv_tasklet(&intf->recv_tasklet);
> >       else
> >               tasklet_schedule(&intf->recv_tasklet);
> >  }
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >



-- 
       - Allen