[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Check the correct variable
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Dec 3 13:13:42 UTC 2020
Quoting Andi Shyti (2020-12-03 11:12:24)
> Hi Dan,
>
> > There is a copy and paste bug in this code. It's supposed to check
> > "obj2" instead of checking "obj" a second time.
> >
> > Fixes: 80f0b679d6f0 ("drm/i915: Add an implementation for i915_gem_ww_ctx locking, v2.")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem.c
> > index 23a6132c5f4e..412e21604a05 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem.c
> > @@ -211,8 +211,8 @@ static int igt_gem_ww_ctx(void *arg)
> > return PTR_ERR(obj);
> >
> > obj2 = i915_gem_object_create_internal(i915, PAGE_SIZE);
> > - if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
> > - err = PTR_ERR(obj);
> > + if (IS_ERR(obj2)) {
> > + err = PTR_ERR(obj2);
>
> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at intel.com>
I gave up waiting for patchwork to spot the original patch, and pushed.
Thanks,
-Chris
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list