[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe protection

[Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX]

Hi Chris,

Are below results satisfying?

Thanks,
Tejas

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kattamanchi, JaswanthX <jaswanthx.kattamanchi at intel.com>
> Sent: 04 December 2020 15:11
> To: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX
> <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay at intel.com>; Chris Wilson
> <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>; Pandey, Hariom <hariom.pandey at intel.com>;
> intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Naramasetti, LaxminarayanaX <laxminarayanax.naramasetti at intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe
> protection
> 
> Hi Tejas,
> 
> As per your request triggered resume run on RKL CI machine, the testcases
> which chris mentioned were passing with this run, Please find the below logs
> for your reference
> 
> Git ID : https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2743
> 
> igt at gem_exec_schedule@pi-ringfull at vcs0 : https://intel-gfx-
> ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9432/re-rkl-1/igt at gem_exec_schedule@pi-
> ringfull at vcs0.html
> 
> igt at gem_exec_schedule@pi-common at vcs0 : https://intel-gfx-
> ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9432/re-rkl-1/igt at gem_exec_schedule@pi-
> common at vcs0.html
> 
> Regards,
> Jaswanth Kattamanchi
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX
> <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay at intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2020 4:38 PM
> To: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>; Pandey, Hariom
> <hariom.pandey at intel.com>; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Kattamanchi,
> JaswanthX <jaswanthx.kattamanchi at intel.com>
> Cc: Naramasetti, LaxminarayanaX <laxminarayanax.naramasetti at intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe
> protection
> 
> + Jaswant
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX
> > Sent: 03 December 2020 09:44
> > To: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>; Pandey, Hariom
> > <hariom.pandey at intel.com>; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove
> > require_force_probe protection
> >
> > Hi Jaswant,
> >
> > Can you please re-run resume run on CI as well as local setup and
> > share results here? If it passes in full resume run in either of setup
> > we are good go with.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tejas
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > > Sent: 30 November 2020 20:31
> > > To: Pandey, Hariom <hariom.pandey at intel.com>; Surendrakumar
> > Upadhyay,
> > > TejaskumarX <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay at intel.com>; intel-
> > > gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove
> > > require_force_probe protection
> > >
> > > Quoting Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX (2020-11-30 14:45:14)
> > > > Hi Chris,
> > > >
> > > > The failing test was not part of BAT run, it ran in CI resume run
> > > > and failed
> > > there, however on manual run the same test got passed. Please find
> > > attached results.
> > >
> > > One pass versus a major failure is not satisfactory.
> > >
> > > We can not say we are happy with the hardware/driver until it is
> > > reliable, and forcewake is of fundamental importance for mmio
> > > access, as well as execution.
> > > -Chris