[Intel-gfx] [patch 23/30] net/mlx5: Use effective interrupt affinity
Tariq Toukan
ttoukan.linux at gmail.com
Sun Dec 13 11:35:57 UTC 2020
On 12/10/2020 9:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Using the interrupt affinity mask for checking locality is not really
> working well on architectures which support effective affinity masks.
>
> The affinity mask is either the system wide default or set by user space,
> but the architecture can or even must reduce the mask to the effective set,
> which means that checking the affinity mask itself does not really tell
> about the actual target CPUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
> Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm at nvidia.com>
> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon at kernel.org>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem at davemloft.net>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba at kernel.org>
> Cc: netdev at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-rdma at vger.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> @@ -1998,7 +1998,7 @@ static int mlx5e_open_channel(struct mlx
> c->num_tc = params->num_tc;
> c->xdp = !!params->xdp_prog;
> c->stats = &priv->channel_stats[ix].ch;
> - c->aff_mask = irq_get_affinity_mask(irq);
> + c->aff_mask = irq_get_effective_affinity_mask(irq);
> c->lag_port = mlx5e_enumerate_lag_port(priv->mdev, ix);
>
> netif_napi_add(netdev, &c->napi, mlx5e_napi_poll, 64);
>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt at nvidia.com>
Thanks.
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list