[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: refactor some crtc code out of intel display.
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Wed Dec 16 12:18:01 UTC 2020
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:03:37PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020, Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
>> >
>> > There may be more crtc code that can be pulled out, but this
>> > is a good start.
>> >
>> > RFC: maybe call the new file something different
>>
>> I checked this is just code movement. I did clean up intel_crtc.h
>> locally a bit though. (I'll probably re-send the series with a few fixes
>> to pass CI.)
>>
>> I'm not averse to renaming the file later if needed, I'm more concerned
>> about choosing a meaningful bunch of functions to take out and put in
>> the new file.
>>
>> Ville, I saw you had some comments about this - is this making sensible
>> progress or making further refactoring harder?
>
> Just means we have to move 90% of the proposed intel_crtc.c
> into i9xx_plane.c again. So the plane bits here are just
> pointless churn IMO.
Fair enough. I just don't want to stall on this again like we've stalled
every time there's been proposals to clean up intel_display.c. And it's
always about some things that could be moved to a different file or
grouped differently or something. I'm pretty close to a point where I'll
take *anything* to chop up the file, and then we'll have better clarity
with smaller files when the dust settles.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list