[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Confirm CS_TIMESTAMP / CTX_TIMESTAMP share a clock

Mika Kuoppala mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com
Wed Dec 23 14:56:06 UTC 2020


Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> We assume that both timestamps are driven off the same clock [reported
> to userspace as I915_PARAM_CS_TIMESTAMP_FREQUENCY]. Verify that this is
> so by reading the timestamp registers around a busywait (on an otherwise
> idle engine so there should be no preemptions).
>
> v2: Icelake (not ehl, nor tgl) seems to be using a fixed 80ns interval
> for, and only for, CTX_TIMESTAMP -- or it may be GPU frequency and the
> test is always running at maximum frequency?. As far as I can tell, this
> isolated change in behaviour is undocumented.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_pm.c | 203 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 202 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_pm.c
> index 163a10b07f85..d88504a5d69c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_pm.c
> @@ -4,15 +4,215 @@
>   * Copyright © 2018 Intel Corporation
>   */
>  
> -#include "intel_gpu_commands.h"
> +#include <linux/sort.h>
>  
>  #include "i915_selftest.h"
> +#include "intel_gpu_commands.h"
> +#include "intel_gt_clock_utils.h"
>  #include "selftest_engine.h"
>  #include "selftest_engine_heartbeat.h"
>  #include "selftests/igt_atomic.h"
>  #include "selftests/igt_flush_test.h"
>  #include "selftests/igt_spinner.h"
>  
> +#define COUNT 5
> +
> +static int cmp_u64(const void *A, const void *B)
> +{
> +	const u64 *a = A, *b = B;
> +
> +	return *a - *b;
> +}
> +
> +static u64 trifilter(u64 *a)
> +{
> +	sort(a, COUNT, sizeof(*a), cmp_u64, NULL);
> +	return (a[1] + 2 * a[2] + a[3]) >> 2;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 *emit_wait(u32 *cs, u32 offset, int op, u32 value)
> +{
> +	*cs++ = MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT |
> +		MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT |
> +		MI_SEMAPHORE_POLL |
> +		op;
> +	*cs++ = value;
> +	*cs++ = offset;
> +	*cs++ = 0;
> +
> +	return cs;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 *emit_store(u32 *cs, u32 offset, u32 value)
> +{
> +	*cs++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4 | MI_USE_GGTT;
> +	*cs++ = offset;
> +	*cs++ = 0;
> +	*cs++ = value;
> +
> +	return cs;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 *emit_srm(u32 *cs, i915_reg_t reg, u32 offset)
> +{
> +	*cs++ = MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM_GEN8 | MI_USE_GGTT;
> +	*cs++ = i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg);
> +	*cs++ = offset;
> +	*cs++ = 0;
> +
> +	return cs;
> +}
> +
> +static void write_semaphore(u32 *x, u32 value)
> +{
> +	WRITE_ONCE(*x, value);
> +	wmb();
> +}
> +
> +static int __measure_timestamps(struct intel_context *ce,
> +				u64 *dt, u64 *d_ring, u64 *d_ctx)
> +{
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine = ce->engine;
> +	u32 *sema = memset32(engine->status_page.addr + 1000, 0, 5);
> +	u32 offset = i915_ggtt_offset(engine->status_page.vma);
> +	struct i915_request *rq;
> +	u32 *cs;
> +
> +	rq = intel_context_create_request(ce);
> +	if (IS_ERR(rq))
> +		return PTR_ERR(rq);
> +
> +	cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 28);
> +	if (IS_ERR(cs)) {
> +		i915_request_add(rq);
> +		return PTR_ERR(cs);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Signal & wait for start */
> +	cs = emit_store(cs, offset + 4008, 1);
> +	cs = emit_wait(cs, offset + 4008, MI_SEMAPHORE_SAD_NEQ_SDD, 1);
> +
> +	cs = emit_srm(cs, RING_TIMESTAMP(engine->mmio_base), offset + 4000);
> +	cs = emit_srm(cs, RING_CTX_TIMESTAMP(engine->mmio_base), offset + 4004);
> +
> +	/* Busy wait */
> +	cs = emit_wait(cs, offset + 4008, MI_SEMAPHORE_SAD_EQ_SDD, 1);
> +
> +	cs = emit_srm(cs, RING_TIMESTAMP(engine->mmio_base), offset + 4016);
> +	cs = emit_srm(cs, RING_CTX_TIMESTAMP(engine->mmio_base), offset + 4012);
> +
> +	intel_ring_advance(rq, cs);
> +	i915_request_get(rq);
> +	i915_request_add(rq);
> +	intel_engine_flush_submission(engine);
> +
> +	/* Wait for the request to start executing, that then waits for us */
> +	while (READ_ONCE(sema[2]) == 0)
> +		cpu_relax();
> +
> +	/* Run the request for a 100us, sampling timestamps before/after */
> +	preempt_disable();
> +	*dt = ktime_get_raw_fast_ns();
> +	write_semaphore(&sema[2], 0);
> +	udelay(100);
> +	write_semaphore(&sema[2], 1);
> +	*dt = ktime_get_raw_fast_ns() - *dt;
> +	preempt_enable();
> +
> +	if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 2) < 0) {
> +		i915_request_put(rq);
> +		return -ETIME;
> +	}
> +	i915_request_put(rq);
> +
> +	pr_debug("%s CTX_TIMESTAMP: [%x, %x], RING_TIMESTAMP: [%x, %x]\n",
> +		 engine->name, sema[1], sema[3], sema[0], sema[4]);
> +
> +	*d_ctx = sema[3] - sema[1];
> +	*d_ring = sema[4] - sema[0];
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __live_engine_timestamps(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +{
> +	u64 s_ring[COUNT], s_ctx[COUNT], st[COUNT], d_ring, d_ctx, dt;
> +	struct intel_context *ce;
> +	int i, err = 0;
> +
> +	ce = intel_context_create(engine);
> +	if (IS_ERR(ce))
> +		return PTR_ERR(ce);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < COUNT; i++) {
> +		err = __measure_timestamps(ce, &st[i], &s_ring[i], &s_ctx[i]);
> +		if (err)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +	intel_context_put(ce);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	dt = trifilter(st);
> +	d_ring = trifilter(s_ring);
> +	d_ctx = trifilter(s_ctx);
> +
> +	pr_info("%s elapsed:%lldns, CTX_TIMESTAMP:%dns, RING_TIMESTAMP:%dns\n",
> +		engine->name, dt,
> +		intel_gt_clock_interval_to_ns(engine->gt, d_ctx),
> +		intel_gt_clock_interval_to_ns(engine->gt, d_ring));
> +
> +	d_ring = intel_gt_clock_interval_to_ns(engine->gt, d_ring);
> +	if (3 * dt > 4 * d_ring || 4 * dt < 3 * d_ring) {
> +		pr_err("%s Mismatch between ring timestamp and walltime!\n",
> +		       engine->name);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	d_ring = trifilter(s_ring);
> +	d_ctx = trifilter(s_ctx);
> +
> +	d_ctx *= RUNTIME_INFO(engine->i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz;
> +	if (IS_ICELAKE(engine->i915))
> +		d_ring *= 12500000; /* Fixed 80ns for icl ctx timestamp? */

This is...weird. But I am not going to argue against hardware.

Will be interesting to see if this can find something funny.

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>

> +	else
> +		d_ring *= RUNTIME_INFO(engine->i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz;
> +
> +	if (3 * d_ctx > 4 * d_ring || 4 * d_ctx < 3 * d_ring) {
> +		pr_err("%s Mismatch between ring and context timestamps!\n",
> +		       engine->name);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int live_engine_timestamps(void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> +	enum intel_engine_id id;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Check that CS_TIMESTAMP / CTX_TIMESTAMP are in sync, i.e. share
> +	 * the same CS clock.
> +	 */
> +
> +	if (INTEL_GEN(gt->i915) < 8)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	for_each_engine(engine, gt, id) {
> +		int err;
> +
> +		st_engine_heartbeat_disable(engine);
> +		err = __live_engine_timestamps(engine);
> +		st_engine_heartbeat_enable(engine);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int live_engine_busy_stats(void *arg)
>  {
>  	struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
> @@ -179,6 +379,7 @@ static int live_engine_pm(void *arg)
>  int live_engine_pm_selftests(struct intel_gt *gt)
>  {
>  	static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
> +		SUBTEST(live_engine_timestamps),
>  		SUBTEST(live_engine_busy_stats),
>  		SUBTEST(live_engine_pm),
>  	};
> -- 
> 2.20.1


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list