[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Remove (pipe == crtc->index) assumption
Anshuman Gupta
anshuman.gupta at intel.com
Tue Feb 4 11:29:22 UTC 2020
we can't have (pipe == crtc->index) assumption in
driver in order to support 3 non-contiguous
display pipe system.
FIXME: Remove the WARN_ON(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base) != crtc->pipe)
till we won't fix all such assumption.
changes since RFC:
- Added again removed (pipe == crtc->index) WARN_ON.
- Pass drm_crtc_index instead of intel pipe in order to
call drm_handle_vblank() from gen8_de_irq_handler(),
other legacy irq handlers also calls drm_handle_vblank()
with intel pipe but those doesn't require this change.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 8 ++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 4 +++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 8 ++++++--
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 878d331b9e8c..5709e672151a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -14070,11 +14070,11 @@ verify_single_dpll_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
if (new_crtc_state->hw.active)
I915_STATE_WARN(!(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask),
"pll active mismatch (expected pipe %c in active mask 0x%02x)\n",
- pipe_name(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)), pll->active_mask);
+ pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask);
else
I915_STATE_WARN(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask,
"pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in active mask 0x%02x)\n",
- pipe_name(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)), pll->active_mask);
+ pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask);
I915_STATE_WARN(!(pll->state.crtc_mask & crtc_mask),
"pll enabled crtcs mismatch (expected 0x%x in 0x%02x)\n",
@@ -14103,10 +14103,10 @@ verify_shared_dpll_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
I915_STATE_WARN(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask,
"pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in active mask)\n",
- pipe_name(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)));
+ pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
I915_STATE_WARN(pll->state.crtc_mask & crtc_mask,
"pll enabled crtcs mismatch (found %x in enabled mask)\n",
- pipe_name(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)));
+ pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
}
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
index 33ba93863488..80a6460da852 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
@@ -1618,7 +1618,9 @@ intel_crtc_has_dp_encoder(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
static inline void
intel_wait_for_vblank(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe)
{
- drm_wait_one_vblank(&dev_priv->drm, pipe);
+ const struct intel_crtc *crtc = intel_get_crtc_for_pipe(dev_priv, pipe);
+
+ drm_wait_one_vblank(&dev_priv->drm, drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base));
}
static inline void
intel_wait_for_vblank_if_active(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 22ecd5bc407e..9f8b2566166a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -2311,6 +2311,8 @@ gen8_de_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 master_ctl)
for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
u32 fault_errors;
+ struct intel_crtc *crtc =
+ intel_get_crtc_for_pipe(dev_priv, pipe);
if (!(master_ctl & GEN8_DE_PIPE_IRQ(pipe)))
continue;
@@ -2324,8 +2326,10 @@ gen8_de_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 master_ctl)
ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
I915_WRITE(GEN8_DE_PIPE_IIR(pipe), iir);
- if (iir & GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK)
- drm_handle_vblank(&dev_priv->drm, pipe);
+ if (iir & GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK) {
+ drm_handle_vblank(&dev_priv->drm,
+ drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base));
+ }
if (iir & GEN8_PIPE_CDCLK_CRC_DONE)
hsw_pipe_crc_irq_handler(dev_priv, pipe);
--
2.24.0
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list