[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Disable use of hwsp_cacheline for kernel_context

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Tue Feb 4 21:18:53 UTC 2020


Currently on execlists, we use a local hwsp for the kernel_context,
rather than the engine's HWSP, as this is the default for execlists.
However, seqno rollover requires allocating a new HWSP cachline, and may
require pinning a new HWSP page in the GTT. This operation requiring
pinning in the GGTT is not allowed within the kernel_context timeline,
as doing so may require re-entering the kernel_context in order to evict
from the GGTT. As we want to avoid requiring a new HWSP for the
kernel_context, we can use the permanently pinned engine's HWSP instead.
However to do so we must prevent the use of semaphores reading the
kernel_context's HWSP, as the use of semaphores do not support rollover
onto the same cacheline. Fortunately, the kernel_context is mostly
isolated, so unlikely to give benefit to semaphores.

Reported-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 10 ++++++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index c196fb90c59f..bc47afcc801f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -2970,7 +2970,8 @@ static int gen8_emit_init_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq)
 {
 	u32 *cs;
 
-	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_timeline(rq)->has_initial_breadcrumb);
+	if (!i915_request_timeline(rq)->has_initial_breadcrumb)
+		return 0;
 
 	cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 6);
 	if (IS_ERR(cs))
@@ -4622,8 +4623,13 @@ static int __execlists_context_alloc(struct intel_context *ce,
 
 	if (!ce->timeline) {
 		struct intel_timeline *tl;
+		struct i915_vma *hwsp;
+
+		hwsp = NULL;
+		if (unlikely(test_bit(CONTEXT_BARRIER_BIT, &ce->flags)))
+			hwsp = engine->status_page.vma;
 
-		tl = intel_timeline_create(engine->gt, NULL);
+		tl = intel_timeline_create(engine->gt, hwsp);
 		if (IS_ERR(tl)) {
 			ret = PTR_ERR(tl);
 			goto error_deref_obj;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index f56b046a32de..f69c0a2c7011 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -881,11 +881,28 @@ __emit_semaphore_wait(struct i915_request *to,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool can_use_semaphore(const struct i915_request *rq)
+{
+	bool ok;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	ok = rcu_dereference(rq->timeline)->hwsp_cacheline;
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return ok;
+}
+
 static int
 emit_semaphore_wait(struct i915_request *to,
 		    struct i915_request *from,
 		    gfp_t gfp)
 {
+	if (!intel_context_use_semaphores(to->context))
+		goto await_fence;
+
+	if (!can_use_semaphore(from))
+		goto await_fence;
+
 	/* Just emit the first semaphore we see as request space is limited. */
 	if (already_busywaiting(to) & from->engine->mask)
 		goto await_fence;
@@ -931,12 +948,8 @@ i915_request_await_request(struct i915_request *to, struct i915_request *from)
 		ret = i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence_gfp(&to->submit,
 						       &from->submit,
 						       I915_FENCE_GFP);
-	else if (intel_context_use_semaphores(to->context))
-		ret = emit_semaphore_wait(to, from, I915_FENCE_GFP);
 	else
-		ret = i915_sw_fence_await_dma_fence(&to->submit,
-						    &from->fence, 0,
-						    I915_FENCE_GFP);
+		ret = emit_semaphore_wait(to, from, I915_FENCE_GFP);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-- 
2.25.0



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list