[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Feb 5 00:16:27 UTC 2020
Quoting Matt Roper (2020-02-05 00:11:46)
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 11:40:06PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Program MBUS with rmw during initialization
> > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/72950/
> > State : failure
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7866 -> Patchwork_16408
> > ====================================================
> >
> > Summary
> > -------
> >
> > **FAILURE**
> >
> > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_16408 absolutely need to be
> > verified manually.
> >
> > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> > introduced in Patchwork_16408, please notify your bug team to allow them
> > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> >
> > External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/index.html
> >
> > Possible new issues
> > -------------------
> >
> > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_16408:
> >
> > ### IGT changes ###
> >
> > #### Possible regressions ####
> >
> > * igt at gem_ctx_create@basic-files:
> > - fi-skl-6770hq: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][1]
> > [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16408/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files.html
>
> Unrelated to this series. These patches only touch a function that's
> exclusive to gen11+, so it would have no impact on SKL (which in this
> case seems to have just crashed or been disconnected with no visible
> errors).
ext4 panicked, not for the first time on that machine.
-Chris
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list