[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] i915/gem_ctx_exec: Cover all engines for nohangcheck
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Wed Feb 5 11:48:42 UTC 2020
On 04/02/2020 16:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
> No engine can be missed when verifying that a rogue user cannot cause a
> denial-of-service with nohangcheck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> ---
> __for_each_physical_engine, keep the leaks
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_ctx_exec.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_exec.c b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_exec.c
> index b1ae65774..aeb8d2976 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_exec.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_exec.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>
> #include "igt_dummyload.h"
> #include "igt_sysfs.h"
> +#include "sw_sync.h"
>
> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test context batch buffer execution.");
>
> @@ -203,9 +204,9 @@ static bool __enable_hangcheck(int dir, bool state)
>
> static void nohangcheck_hostile(int i915)
> {
> - int64_t timeout = NSEC_PER_SEC / 2;
> - igt_spin_t *spin;
> + const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e;
> igt_hang_t hang;
> + int fence = -1;
> uint32_t ctx;
> int err = 0;
> int dir;
> @@ -215,6 +216,8 @@ static void nohangcheck_hostile(int i915)
> * we forcibly terminate that context.
> */
>
> + i915 = gem_reopen_driver(i915);
> +
> dir = igt_sysfs_open_parameters(i915);
> igt_require(dir != -1);
>
> @@ -223,16 +226,35 @@ static void nohangcheck_hostile(int i915)
>
> igt_require(__enable_hangcheck(dir, false));
>
> - spin = igt_spin_new(i915, ctx, .flags = IGT_SPIN_NO_PREEMPTION);
> + __for_each_physical_engine(i915, e) {
> + igt_spin_t *spin;
> +
> + spin = igt_spin_new(i915, ctx,
> + .engine = e->flags,
Ouch, I missed a mismatch between ctx and e->flags here. Thanks to
Sreedhar for reporting it.
We either need gem_context_set_all_engines back or to rethink a cleaner
strategy.
Regards,
Tvrtko
> + .flags = (IGT_SPIN_NO_PREEMPTION |
> + IGT_SPIN_FENCE_OUT));
> +
> + igt_assert(spin->out_fence != -1);
> + if (fence < 0) {
> + fence = spin->out_fence;
> + spin->out_fence = -1;
> + } else {
> + int new;
> +
> + new = sync_fence_merge(fence, spin->out_fence);
> + close(fence);
> +
> + fence = new;
> + }
> + }
> gem_context_destroy(i915, ctx);
> + igt_assert(fence != -1);
>
> - if (gem_wait(i915, spin->handle, &timeout)) {
> + if (sync_fence_wait(fence, MSEC_PER_SEC / 2)) {
> igt_debugfs_dump(i915, "i915_engine_info");
> err = -ETIME;
> }
>
> - igt_spin_free(i915, spin);
> -
> __enable_hangcheck(dir, true);
> gem_quiescent_gpu(i915);
> igt_disallow_hang(i915, hang);
> @@ -240,7 +262,11 @@ static void nohangcheck_hostile(int i915)
> igt_assert_f(err == 0,
> "Hostile unpreemptable context was not cancelled immediately upon closure\n");
>
> + igt_assert_eq(sync_fence_status(fence), -EIO);
> + close(fence);
> +
> close(dir);
> + close(i915);
> }
>
> igt_main
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list