[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_ctx_exec: Update the list of engines on the actual context

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 05/02/2020 11:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
> We want to iterate the set of physical engines on this context, so
> update the iterators to act on a particular context.
> 
> This tunnel keeps on getting longer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> ---
>   lib/i915/gem_engine_topology.h | 7 +++++--
>   tests/i915/gem_ctx_exec.c      | 2 +-
>   2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/i915/gem_engine_topology.h b/lib/i915/gem_engine_topology.h
> index e40d7ec83..027d86be2 100644
> --- a/lib/i915/gem_engine_topology.h
> +++ b/lib/i915/gem_engine_topology.h
> @@ -67,9 +67,12 @@ struct intel_execution_engine2 gem_eb_flags_to_engine(unsigned int flags);
>   	     intel_next_engine(&i__))
>   
>   /* needs to replace "for_each_physical_engine" when conflicts are fixed */
> -#define __for_each_physical_engine(fd__, e__) \
> -	for (struct intel_engine_data i__ = intel_init_engine_list(fd__, 0); \
> +#define ____for_each_physical_engine(fd__, ctx__, e__) \
> +	for (struct intel_engine_data i__ = intel_init_engine_list(fd__, ctx__); \
>   	     ((e__) = intel_get_current_physical_engine(&i__)); \
>   	     intel_next_engine(&i__))
>   
> +#define __for_each_physical_engine(fd__, e__) \
> +	____for_each_physical_engine(fd__, 0, e__)
> +
>   #endif /* GEM_ENGINE_TOPOLOGY_H */
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_exec.c b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_exec.c
> index aeb8d2976..5b4e4b3db 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_exec.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_exec.c
> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static void nohangcheck_hostile(int i915)
>   
>   	igt_require(__enable_hangcheck(dir, false));
>   
> -	__for_each_physical_engine(i915, e) {
> +	____for_each_physical_engine(i915, ctx, e) {
>   		igt_spin_t *spin;
>   
>   		spin = igt_spin_new(i915, ctx,
> 

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko