[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_ctx_persistence: Check that we cannot hide hangs on old engines
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Wed Feb 5 15:50:26 UTC 2020
On 05/02/2020 13:48, Chris Wilson wrote:
> As the kernel loses track of the context's old engines, if we request
> that the context is non-persistent then any request on the untracked
> engines must be cancelled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c
> index c54797e9b..04a6c179e 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c
> @@ -761,6 +761,49 @@ static void smoketest(int i915)
> gem_quiescent_gpu(i915);
> }
>
> +static void replace_engines_hostile(int i915,
> + const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
> +{
> + I915_DEFINE_CONTEXT_PARAM_ENGINES(engines, 1) = {
> + .engines = {{ e->class, e->instance }}
> + };
> + struct drm_i915_gem_context_param param = {
> + .ctx_id = gem_context_create(i915),
> + .param = I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_ENGINES,
> + .value = to_user_pointer(&engines),
> + .size = sizeof(engines),
> + };
> + igt_spin_t *spin[2];
> + int64_t timeout;
> +
> + /*
> + * Suppose the user tries to hide a hanging batch by replacing
> + * the set of engines on the context so that it's not visible
> + * at the time of closure? Then we must act when they replace
> + * the engines!
> + */
> +
> + gem_context_set_persistence(i915, param.ctx_id, false);
> +
> + gem_context_set_param(i915, ¶m);
> + spin[0] = igt_spin_new(i915, param.ctx_id);
> +
> + gem_context_set_param(i915, ¶m);
> + spin[1] = igt_spin_new(i915, param.ctx_id);
> +
> + gem_context_destroy(i915, param.ctx_id);
At this point context_close() -> kill_context() but spin[0]
intel_context no longer in ctx->engines so hangs. spin[1] is terminated.
> +
> + timeout = reset_timeout_ms * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
> + igt_assert_eq(gem_wait(i915, spin[1]->handle, &timeout), 0);
> +
> + timeout = reset_timeout_ms * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
> + igt_assert_eq(gem_wait(i915, spin[0]->handle, &timeout), 0);
> +
> + igt_spin_free(i915, spin[1]);
> + igt_spin_free(i915, spin[0]);
> + gem_quiescent_gpu(i915);
> +}
> +
> int i915;
>
> static void exit_handler(int sig)
> @@ -793,10 +836,10 @@ igt_main
> igt_assert(igt_sysfs_set_parameter
> (i915, "reset", "%d", -1 /* any [default] reset */));
>
> - igt_require(has_persistence(i915));
> enable_hangcheck(i915);
> igt_install_exit_handler(exit_handler);
>
> + igt_require(has_persistence(i915));
> igt_allow_hang(i915, 0, 0);
> }
>
> @@ -861,6 +904,21 @@ igt_main
> smoketest(i915);
> }
>
> + /* Check interactions with set-engines */
> + igt_subtest_group {
> + const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e;
> +
> + igt_fixture
> + gem_require_contexts(i915);
> +
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("replace-hostile") {
> + __for_each_physical_engine(i915, e) {
> + igt_dynamic_f("%s", e->name)
> + replace_engines_hostile(i915, e);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> igt_fixture {
> close(i915);
> }
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list