[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 06/10] drm/i915/uc: Improve tracking of uC init status
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com
Thu Feb 13 23:44:56 UTC 2020
On 2/13/20 3:36 PM, John Harrison wrote:
> On 2/11/2020 16:31, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
>> To be able to setup GuC submission functions during engine init we need
>> to commit to using GuC as soon as possible.
>> Currently, the only thing that can stop us from using the
>> microcontrollers once we've fetched the blobs is a fundamental
>> error (e.g. OOM); given that if we hit such an error we can't really
>> fall-back to anything, we can "officialize" the FW fetching completion
>> as the moment at which we're committing to using GuC.
>>
>> To better differentiate this case, the uses_guc check, which indicates
>> that GuC is supported and was selected in modparam, is renamed to
>> wants_guc and a new uses_guc is introduced to represent the case were
>> we're committed to using the GuC. Note that uses_guc does still not imply
>> that the blob is actually loaded on the HW (is_running is the check for
>> that). Also, since we need to have attempted the fetch for the result
>> of uses_guc to be meaningful, we need to make sure we've moved away
>> from INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SELECTED.
>>
>> All the GuC changes have been mirrored on the HuC for coherency.
>>
>> v2: split fetch return changes and new macros to their own patches,
>> support HuC only if GuC is wanted, improve "used" state
>> description (Michal)
>>
>> v3: s/wants_huc/uses_huc in uc_init_wopcm
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
>> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
>> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Fernando Pacheco <fernando.pacheco at intel.com> #v1
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h | 8 +++++++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.h | 8 +++++++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc_fw.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c | 21 +++++++++++---------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
>> index 668b067b71e2..b51adaac8752 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
>> @@ -143,11 +143,17 @@ static inline bool intel_guc_is_supported(struct
>> intel_guc *guc)
>> return intel_uc_fw_is_supported(&guc->fw);
>> }
>> -static inline bool intel_guc_is_enabled(struct intel_guc *guc)
>> +static inline bool intel_guc_is_wanted(struct intel_guc *guc)
>> {
>> return intel_uc_fw_is_enabled(&guc->fw);
>> }
>> +static inline bool intel_guc_is_used(struct intel_guc *guc)
>> +{
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(__intel_uc_fw_status(&guc->fw) ==
>> INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SELECTED);
>> + return intel_uc_fw_is_available(&guc->fw);
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline bool intel_guc_is_fw_running(struct intel_guc *guc)
>> {
>> return intel_uc_fw_is_running(&guc->fw);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.h
>> index 644c059fe01d..a40b9cfc6c22 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.h
>> @@ -41,11 +41,17 @@ static inline bool intel_huc_is_supported(struct
>> intel_huc *huc)
>> return intel_uc_fw_is_supported(&huc->fw);
>> }
>> -static inline bool intel_huc_is_enabled(struct intel_huc *huc)
>> +static inline bool intel_huc_is_wanted(struct intel_huc *huc)
>> {
>> return intel_uc_fw_is_enabled(&huc->fw);
>> }
>> +static inline bool intel_huc_is_used(struct intel_huc *huc)
>> +{
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(__intel_uc_fw_status(&huc->fw) ==
>> INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SELECTED);
>> + return intel_uc_fw_is_available(&huc->fw);
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline bool intel_huc_is_authenticated(struct intel_huc *huc)
>> {
>> return intel_uc_fw_is_running(&huc->fw);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc_fw.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc_fw.c
>> index eee193bf2cc4..9cdf4cbe691c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc_fw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc_fw.c
>> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ void intel_huc_fw_init_early(struct intel_huc *huc)
>> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gt->i915;
>> intel_uc_fw_init_early(&huc->fw, INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_HUC,
>> - intel_uc_uses_guc(uc),
>> + intel_uc_wants_guc(uc),
>> INTEL_INFO(i915)->platform, INTEL_REVID(i915));
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
>> index affc4d6f9ead..5825a6c3e0a0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
>> @@ -48,17 +48,17 @@ static void __confirm_options(struct intel_uc *uc)
>> DRM_DEV_DEBUG_DRIVER(i915->drm.dev,
>> "enable_guc=%d (guc:%s submission:%s huc:%s)\n",
>> i915_modparams.enable_guc,
>> - yesno(intel_uc_uses_guc(uc)),
>> + yesno(intel_uc_wants_guc(uc)),
>> yesno(intel_uc_uses_guc_submission(uc)),
>> - yesno(intel_uc_uses_huc(uc)));
>> + yesno(intel_uc_wants_huc(uc)));
>> if (i915_modparams.enable_guc == -1)
>> return;
>> if (i915_modparams.enable_guc == 0) {
>> - GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uc_uses_guc(uc));
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uc_wants_guc(uc));
>> GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uc_uses_guc_submission(uc));
>> - GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uc_uses_huc(uc));
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uc_wants_huc(uc));
>> return;
>> }
>> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ void intel_uc_init_early(struct intel_uc *uc)
>> __confirm_options(uc);
>> - if (intel_uc_uses_guc(uc))
>> + if (intel_uc_wants_guc(uc))
>> uc->ops = &uc_ops_on;
>> else
>> uc->ops = &uc_ops_off;
>> @@ -257,13 +257,13 @@ static void __uc_fetch_firmwares(struct intel_uc
>> *uc)
>> {
>> int err;
>> - GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_uc_uses_guc(uc));
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_uc_wants_guc(uc));
>> err = intel_uc_fw_fetch(&uc->guc.fw);
>> if (err)
>> return;
>> - if (intel_uc_uses_huc(uc))
>> + if (intel_uc_wants_huc(uc))
>> intel_uc_fw_fetch(&uc->huc.fw);
>> }
>> @@ -279,7 +279,10 @@ static void __uc_init(struct intel_uc *uc)
>> struct intel_huc *huc = &uc->huc;
>> int ret;
>> - GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_uc_uses_guc(uc));
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_uc_wants_guc(uc));
>> +
>> + if (!intel_uc_uses_guc(uc))
>> + return;
>> /* XXX: GuC submission is unavailable for now */
>> GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uc_supports_guc_submission(uc));
>> @@ -402,7 +405,7 @@ static int __uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc)
>> int ret, attempts;
>> GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_uc_supports_guc(uc));
>> - GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_uc_uses_guc(uc));
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_uc_wants_guc(uc));
>> if (!intel_uc_fw_is_available(&guc->fw)) {
>> ret = __uc_check_hw(uc) ||
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h
>> index 2ce993ceb60a..a41aaf353f88 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h
>> @@ -40,6 +40,27 @@ void intel_uc_runtime_suspend(struct intel_uc *uc);
>> int intel_uc_resume(struct intel_uc *uc);
>> int intel_uc_runtime_resume(struct intel_uc *uc);
>> +/*
>> + * We need to know as early as possible if we're going to use GuC or
>> not to
>> + * take the correct setup paths. Additionally, once we've started
>> loading the
>> + * GuC, it is unsafe to keep executing without it because some parts
>> of the HW,
>> + * a subset of which is not cleaned on GT reset, will start expecting
>> the GuC FW
>> + * to be running.
>> + * To solve both these requirements, we commit to using the
>> microcontrollers if
>> + * the relevant modparam is set and the blobs are found on the
>> system. At this
>> + * stage, the only thing that can stop us from attempting to load the
>> blobs on
>> + * the HW and use them is a fundamental issue (e.g. no memory for our
>> + * structures); if we hit such a problem during driver load we're
>> broken even
>> + * without GuC, so there is no point in trying to fall back.
>> + *
>> + * Given the above, we can be in one of 4 states, with the last one
>> implying
>> + * we're committed to using the microcontroller:
>> + * - Not supported: not available in HW and/or firmware not defined.
>> + * - Supported: available in HW and firmware defined.
>> + * - Wanted: supported + enabled in modparam.
>> + * - In use: wanted + firmware found on the system and successfully
>> fetched.
> Should be another line for 'Running'? I guess the definition of
> 'is_running' comes from elsewhere but it would make sense to include it
> in the description here.
"Running" belongs to a different set of states, indicating the current
state of the uC. The ones added here are about what we plan to do with
the GuC, not what the current state is, so I disagree that it makes
sense to add "running" here.
>
> Also, it would be good to include the actual function names themselves.
> That way if someone searches on 'intel_uc_uses_guc', for example, they
> will find this description. Especially as searching for them by either
> text or symbol will not find the definition!
>
How do you want them added? We don't usually do that for autogenerated
functions (there is an example of that further down in this file).
Daniele
> With that tweak:
> Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
>
>
>> + */
>> +
>> #define __uc_state_checker(x, state, required) \
>> static inline bool intel_uc_##state##_##x(struct intel_uc *uc) \
>> { \
>> @@ -48,7 +69,8 @@ static inline bool intel_uc_##state##_##x(struct
>> intel_uc *uc) \
>> #define uc_state_checkers(x) \
>> __uc_state_checker(x, supports, supported) \
>> -__uc_state_checker(x, uses, enabled)
>> +__uc_state_checker(x, wants, wanted) \
>> +__uc_state_checker(x, uses, used)
>> uc_state_checkers(guc);
>> uc_state_checkers(huc);
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list