[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/12] drm: Nuke mode->vrefresh

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 01:32:40PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Ville.
> 
> Nice patch - and diffstat looks good:
> >  63 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 392 deletions(-)
> 
> There is an item in the Documentation/gpu/todo.rst that
> describes this.
> Could you drop this from todo.rst in this patch too.

Yeah, missed the TODO. Looks like there's one for hsync
removal as well.

> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mcde/mcde_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mcde/mcde_dsi.c
> > index bb6528b01cd0..6dca5344c0b3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mcde/mcde_dsi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mcde/mcde_dsi.c
> > @@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ static void mcde_dsi_setup_video_mode(struct mcde_dsi *d,
> >  	 */
> >  	/* (ps/s) / (pixels/s) = ps/pixels */
> >  	pclk = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(1000000000000,
> > -				(mode->vrefresh * mode->htotal * mode->vtotal));
> > +				(drm_mode_vrefresh(mode) * mode->htotal * mode->vtotal));
> >  	dev_dbg(d->dev, "picoseconds between two pixels: %llu\n",
> >  		pclk);
> >  
> 
> This just caught my eye while browsing the patch.
> It looks like a backward way to get the clock.

Yep. I'll cook up a patch to switch this to ->clock.

> 
> But patch is fine, it was just a drive-by comment.
> 
> Whole patch is:
> Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam at ravnborg.org>
> (with or without removal of todo item added)
> 
> 	Sam

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel