[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 1/8] drm/i915: Start passing latency as parameter
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Thu Feb 27 16:28:47 UTC 2020
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 05:32:33PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> We need to start passing memory latency as a
> parameter when calculating plane wm levels,
> as latency can get changed in different
> circumstances(for example with or without SAGV).
> So we need to be more flexible on that matter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index ffac0b862ca5..d6933e382657 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -4002,6 +4002,7 @@ static int skl_compute_wm_params(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> int color_plane);
> static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> int level,
> + u32 latency,
I'd make it just unsigned int or something all over. Otherwise lgtm
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> const struct skl_wm_params *wp,
> const struct skl_wm_level *result_prev,
> struct skl_wm_level *result /* out */);
> @@ -4024,7 +4025,9 @@ skl_cursor_allocation(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, ret);
>
> for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> - skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, level, &wp, &wm, &wm);
> + u32 latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level];
> +
> + skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, level, latency, &wp, &wm, &wm);
> if (wm.min_ddb_alloc == U16_MAX)
> break;
>
> @@ -4978,12 +4981,12 @@ static bool skl_wm_has_lines(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int level)
>
> static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> int level,
> + u32 latency,
> const struct skl_wm_params *wp,
> const struct skl_wm_level *result_prev,
> struct skl_wm_level *result /* out */)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
> - u32 latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level];
> uint_fixed_16_16_t method1, method2;
> uint_fixed_16_16_t selected_result;
> u32 res_blocks, res_lines, min_ddb_alloc = 0;
> @@ -5112,9 +5115,10 @@ skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>
> for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> struct skl_wm_level *result = &levels[level];
> + u32 latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level];
>
> - skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, level, wm_params,
> - result_prev, result);
> + skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, level, latency,
> + wm_params, result_prev, result);
>
> result_prev = result;
> }
> --
> 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list