[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: Clean up DPLL output/refclock tracking (rev2)

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Clean up DPLL output/refclock tracking (rev2)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/73977/
State : warning

== Summary ==

$ dim sparse origin/drm-tip
Sparse version: v0.6.0
Commit: drm/i915: Fix bounds check in intel_get_shared_dpll_id()
Okay!

Commit: drm/i915: Move DPLL HW readout/sanitize fns to intel_dpll_mgr.c
Okay!

Commit: drm/i915: Keep the global DPLL state in a DPLL specific struct
Okay!

Commit: drm/i915: Move the DPLL vfunc inits after the func defines
Okay!

Commit: drm/i915/hsw: Use the DPLL ID when calculating DPLL clock
Okay!

Commit: drm/i915: Move DPLL frequency calculation to intel_dpll_mgr.c
Okay!

Commit: drm/i915/skl: Parametrize the DPLL ref clock instead of open-coding it
Okay!

Commit: drm/i915/hsw: Rename the get HDMI/DP DPLL funcs to get WRPLL/LCPLL
Okay!

Commit: drm/i915/hsw: Split out the SPLL parameter calculation
Okay!

Commit: drm/i915/hsw: Split out the WRPLL, LCPLL, SPLL frequency calculation
Okay!

Commit: drm/i915/skl, cnl: Split out the WRPLL/LCPLL frequency calculation
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c:2514:5: warning: symbol 'cnl_hdmi_pll_ref_clock' was not declared. Should it be static?

Commit: drm/i915/hsw: Use the read-out WRPLL/SPLL state instead of reading out again
Okay!

Commit: drm/i915: Unify the DPLL ref clock frequency tracking
-O:drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c:2511:5: warning: symbol 'cnl_hdmi_pll_ref_clock' was not declared. Should it be static?