[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 8/9] drm/i915/dp: Update the pattern as per request

Manasi Navare manasi.d.navare at intel.com
Fri Jan 3 23:51:36 UTC 2020


On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 11:23:14AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Dec 2019, Animesh Manna <animesh.manna at intel.com> wrote:
> > As per request from DP phy compliance test few special
> > test pattern need to set by source. Added function
> > to set pattern in DP_COMP_CTL register. It will be
> > called along with other test parameters like vswing,
> > pre-emphasis programming in atomic_commit_tail path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > index cbefda9b6204..7c3f65e5d88b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -5005,6 +5005,61 @@ static u8 intel_dp_prepare_phytest(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  	return DP_TEST_ACK;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline void intel_dp_phy_pattern_update(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> 
> As a general rule, please only use the inline keyword for static inlines
> in headers. Sometimes, it's useful in small helpers, but usually you
> should just let the compiler decide what gets inlined.
> 
> In this case, the inline probably just hides the compiler warning about
> the unused function.
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
>

Yes I completely agree with Jani here, please do not use inline
other than some one line helpers in header files.
 
> > +{
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
> > +			to_i915(dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.dev);
> > +	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > +	struct drm_dp_phy_test_params *data =
> > +			&intel_dp->compliance.test_data.phytest;
> > +	u32 temp;
> > +
> > +	switch (data->phy_pattern) {
> > +	case DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN_NONE:
> > +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Disable Phy Test Pattern\n");
> > +		I915_WRITE(DDI_DP_COMP_CTL(intel_dig_port->base.port), 0x0);
> > +		break;
> > +	case DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN_D10_2:
> > +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Set D10.2 Phy Test Pattern\n");
> > +		I915_WRITE(DDI_DP_COMP_CTL(intel_dig_port->base.port),
> > +			   DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_ENABLE | DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_D10_2);
> > +		break;
> > +	case DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN_ERROR_COUNT:
> > +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Set Error Count Phy Test Pattern\n");
> > +		I915_WRITE(DDI_DP_COMP_CTL(intel_dig_port->base.port),
> > +			   DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_ENABLE |
> > +			   DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_SCRAMBLED_0);
> > +		break;
> > +	case DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN_PRBS7:
> > +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Set PRBS7 Phy Test Pattern\n");
> > +		I915_WRITE(DDI_DP_COMP_CTL(intel_dig_port->base.port),
> > +			   DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_ENABLE | DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_PRBS7);
> > +		break;
> > +	case DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN_80BIT_CUSTOM:
> > +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Set 80Bit Custom Phy Test Pattern\n");
> > +		temp = ((data->custom80[0] << 24) | (data->custom80[1] << 16) |
> > +			(data->custom80[2] << 8) | (data->custom80[3]));
> > +		I915_WRITE(DDI_DP_COMP_PAT(intel_dig_port->base.port, 0), temp);
> > +		temp = ((data->custom80[4] << 24) | (data->custom80[5] << 16) |
> > +			(data->custom80[6] << 8) | (data->custom80[7]));
> > +		I915_WRITE(DDI_DP_COMP_PAT(intel_dig_port->base.port, 1), temp);
> > +		temp = ((data->custom80[8] << 8) | data->custom80[9]);
> > +		I915_WRITE(DDI_DP_COMP_PAT(intel_dig_port->base.port, 2), temp);
> > +		I915_WRITE(DDI_DP_COMP_CTL(intel_dig_port->base.port),
> > +			   DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_ENABLE | DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_CUSTOM80);
> > +		break;
> > +	case DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN_CP2520:
> > +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Set HBR2 compliance Phy Test Pattern\n");
> > +		temp = ((data->hbr2_reset[1] << 8) | data->hbr2_reset[0]);
> > +		I915_WRITE(DDI_DP_COMP_CTL(intel_dig_port->base.port),
> > +			   DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_ENABLE | DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_HBR2 |
> > +			   temp);
> > +		break;
> > +	default:
> > +		WARN(1, "Invalid Phy Test PAttern\n");

Small nit here, it should be PHY Pattern

Manasi

> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  static u8 intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  {
> >  	u8 test_result = DP_TEST_NAK;
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list