[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: convert to new logging macros based on struct intel_engine_cs.
Wambui Karuga
wambui.karugax at gmail.com
Mon Jan 13 13:17:11 UTC 2020
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2020, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>> Quoting Wambui Karuga (2020-01-13 11:10:25)
>>> fn(...) {
>>> ...
>>> struct intel_engine_cs *E = ...;
>>> +struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = E->i915;
>>
>> No new dev_priv.
>
> Wambui, we're gradually converting all dev_priv variable and parameter
> names to i915.
>
Okay, I can change to that - dev_priv seemed more used in the files I
changed.
Thanks,
wambui
>> There should be no reason for drm_dbg here, as the rest of the debug is
>> behind ENGINE_TRACE and so the vestigial debug should be moved over, or
>> deleted as not being useful.
>>
>> The error messages look unhelpful.
>
> I don't think you can expect any meaninful improvements on the debug
> message contents from Wambui without detailed help at this point.
>
>>
>>> if ((batch_end - cmd) < length) {
>>> - DRM_DEBUG("CMD: Command length exceeds batch length: 0x%08X length=%u batchlen=%td\n",
>>> - *cmd,
>>> - length,
>>> - batch_end - cmd);
>>> + drm_dbg(&dev_priv->drm,
>>> + "CMD: Command length exceeds batch length: 0x%08X length=%u batchlen=%td\n",
>>
>> No. This is not driver debug. If anything this should be pr_debug, or
>> some over user centric channel.
>
> I'm sorry, I still don't understand your reasoning here.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list