[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/guc: Kill USES_GUC macro
Michal Wajdeczko
michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Thu Jan 16 19:42:00 UTC 2020
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 02:31:37 +0100, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
<daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com> wrote:
> use intel_uc_uses_guc() directly instead, to be consistent in the way we
> check what we want to do with the GuC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
> index 79096722ce16..bb4aa923dbd9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
> @@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ static int ggtt_reserve_guc_top(struct i915_ggtt
> *ggtt)
> u64 size;
> int ret;
> - if (!USES_GUC(ggtt->vm.i915))
> + if (!intel_uc_uses_guc(&ggtt->vm.gt->uc))
> return 0;
> GEM_BUG_ON(ggtt->vm.total <= GUC_GGTT_TOP);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index d5a9b8a964c2..c2f480defc71 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -1752,10 +1752,8 @@ stringify_guc_log_type(enum guc_log_buffer_type
> type)
> return "";
> }
> -static void i915_guc_log_info(struct seq_file *m,
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +static void i915_guc_log_info(struct seq_file *m, struct intel_guc_log
hmm, s/dev_priv/guc_log changes look unrelated to main topic
can you move these changes to separate patch ?
> *log)
> {
> - struct intel_guc_log *log = &dev_priv->gt.uc.guc.log;
> enum guc_log_buffer_type type;
> if (!intel_guc_log_relay_created(log)) {
> @@ -1779,11 +1777,12 @@ static void i915_guc_log_info(struct seq_file *m,
> static int i915_guc_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private);
> + struct intel_uc *uc = &dev_priv->gt.uc;
> - if (!USES_GUC(dev_priv))
> + if (!intel_uc_uses_guc(uc))
> return -ENODEV;
> - i915_guc_log_info(m, dev_priv);
> + i915_guc_log_info(m, &uc->guc.log);
> /* Add more as required ... */
> @@ -1884,11 +1883,12 @@ static int i915_guc_log_dump(struct seq_file *m,
> void *data)
> static int i915_guc_log_level_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = data;
> + struct intel_uc *uc = &dev_priv->gt.uc;
> - if (!USES_GUC(dev_priv))
> + if (!intel_uc_uses_guc(uc))
> return -ENODEV;
> - *val = intel_guc_log_get_level(&dev_priv->gt.uc.guc.log);
> + *val = intel_guc_log_get_level(&uc->guc.log);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1896,11 +1896,12 @@ static int i915_guc_log_level_get(void *data,
> u64 *val)
> static int i915_guc_log_level_set(void *data, u64 val)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = data;
> + struct intel_uc *uc = &dev_priv->gt.uc;
> - if (!USES_GUC(dev_priv))
> + if (!intel_uc_uses_guc(uc))
> return -ENODEV;
> - return intel_guc_log_set_level(&dev_priv->gt.uc.guc.log, val);
> + return intel_guc_log_set_level(&uc->guc.log, val);
> }
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(i915_guc_log_level_fops,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 077af22b8340..ad0019cd2604 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1719,7 +1719,6 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> #define HAS_GT_UC(dev_priv) (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->has_gt_uc)
> /* Having GuC is not the same as using GuC */
> -#define USES_GUC(dev_priv) intel_uc_uses_guc(&(dev_priv)->gt.uc)
> #define
> USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv) intel_uc_uses_guc_submission(&(dev_priv)->gt.uc)
> #define HAS_POOLED_EU(dev_priv) (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->has_pooled_eu)
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list