[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915/guc: Don't pass CTB while writing
Michal Wajdeczko
michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Fri Jan 17 08:20:36 UTC 2020
Since we only have one SEND buffer we don't need to explicitly pass
it to the write function.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
index 338e29d66383..25d912d57fa2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
@@ -311,12 +311,13 @@ static u32 ct_get_next_fence(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
* ^-----------------len-------------------^
*/
-static int ctb_write(struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb,
- const u32 *action,
- u32 len /* in dwords */,
- u32 fence,
- bool want_response)
+static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
+ const u32 *action,
+ u32 len /* in dwords */,
+ u32 fence,
+ bool want_response)
{
+ struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs[CTB_SEND];
struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc = ctb->desc;
u32 head = desc->head / 4; /* in dwords */
u32 tail = desc->tail / 4; /* in dwords */
@@ -492,7 +493,7 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
list_add_tail(&request.link, &ct->requests.pending);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->requests.lock, flags);
- err = ctb_write(ctb, action, len, fence, !!response_buf);
+ err = ct_write(ct, action, len, fence, !!response_buf);
if (unlikely(err))
goto unlink;
--
2.19.2
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list