[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] intel-ci: Reduce variety of gem_sync in BAT

[Mika Kuoppala]

Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> Historically, we've had many problems with missed interrupt/seqno
> syndrome and so have focus on testing with gem_sync. However, these
> tests rely on the kernel itself reporting the issue which it no longer
> does. So why the extra variety may impose different timing of execution
> on the HW (and so different interrupt timings which may or may not help
> uncover issues), they do not have any variety in driver coverage. Reduce
> the variety (halving the associated runtime) as they are no more likely
> to spot an issue than multiple runs through BAT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>

Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> index f697eb0cf..8c574d910 100644
> --- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> @@ -45,9 +45,6 @@ igt at gem_ringfill@basic-default-forked
>  igt at gem_ringfill@basic-default-fd
>  igt at gem_sync@basic-all
>  igt at gem_sync@basic-each
> -igt at gem_sync@basic-many-each
> -igt at gem_sync@basic-store-all
> -igt at gem_sync@basic-store-each
>  igt at gem_tiled_blits@basic
>  igt at gem_tiled_fence_blits@basic
>  igt at gem_tiled_pread_basic
> -- 
> 2.25.0