[Intel-gfx] [RFC 2/6] drm/i915: Remove (pipe == crtc->index) asummption

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 06:56:55PM +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
> we can't have (pipe == crtc->index) assumption in
> driver in order to support 3 non-contiguous
> display pipe system.
> 
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 10 ++++------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 878d331b9e8c..afd8d43160c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -14070,11 +14070,11 @@ verify_single_dpll_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	if (new_crtc_state->hw.active)
>  		I915_STATE_WARN(!(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask),
>  				"pll active mismatch (expected pipe %c in active mask 0x%02x)\n",
> -				pipe_name(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)), pll->active_mask);
> +				pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask);
>  	else
>  		I915_STATE_WARN(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask,
>  				"pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in active mask 0x%02x)\n",
> -				pipe_name(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)), pll->active_mask);
> +				pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask);
>  
>  	I915_STATE_WARN(!(pll->state.crtc_mask & crtc_mask),
>  			"pll enabled crtcs mismatch (expected 0x%x in 0x%02x)\n",
> @@ -14103,10 +14103,10 @@ verify_shared_dpll_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  
>  		I915_STATE_WARN(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask,
>  				"pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in active mask)\n",
> -				pipe_name(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)));
> +				pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
>  		I915_STATE_WARN(pll->state.crtc_mask & crtc_mask,
>  				"pll enabled crtcs mismatch (found %x in enabled mask)\n",
> -				pipe_name(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)));
> +				pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -16485,8 +16485,6 @@ static int intel_crtc_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe)
>  
>  	intel_color_init(crtc);
>  
> -	WARN_ON(drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base) != crtc->pipe);
> -

The first and second hunks don't really have anything to do with
each other. Also the WARN_ON() should not be removed until all the
assumptions are fixed.

>  	return 0;
>  
>  fail:
> -- 
> 2.24.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel