[Intel-gfx] [PATCH RESEND 1/6] drm/i915/dmc: use intel uncore functions for forcewake register access
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Jan 23 14:33:26 UTC 2020
Quoting Ville Syrjälä (2020-01-23 14:10:34)
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 03:59:59PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > Move away from I915_READ_FW() and I915_WRITE_FW() and switch to using
> > intel_uncore_read_fw() and intel_uncore_write_fw(), respectively.
> >
> > No functional changes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
> > index ae25960f74e0..6a408e11a3de 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
> > @@ -315,7 +315,8 @@ void intel_csr_load_program(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > preempt_disable();
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < fw_size; i++)
> > - I915_WRITE_FW(CSR_PROGRAM(i), payload[i]);
> > + intel_uncore_write_fw(&dev_priv->uncore, CSR_PROGRAM(i),
> > + payload[i]);
>
> Why uncore instead of de?
Outside of display/
It might be very well worth moving intel_csr.c under the auspices of
display powermanagement.
-Chris
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list