[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/huc: Fix error reported by I915_PARAM_HUC_STATUS
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Jan 23 15:02:17 UTC 2020
Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2020-01-22 23:52:33)
>
>
> On 1/22/20 11:48 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> > From commit 84b1ca2f0e68 ("drm/i915/uc: prefer intel_gt over i915
> > in GuC/HuC paths") we stopped using HUC_STATUS error -ENODEV only
> > to indicate lack of HuC hardware and we started to use this error
> > also for all other cases when HuC was not in use or supported.
> >
> > Fix that by relying again on HAS_GT_UC macro, since currently
> > used function intel_huc_is_supported() is based on HuC firmware
> > support which could be unsupported also due to force disabled
> > GuC firmware.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> > Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
> > Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> > Cc: Tony Ye <tony.ye at intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
Once upon a time did you (Michal) not argue we should indicate the lack
of firmware in the error code? Something like
if (!HAS_GT_UC(gt->i915))
return -ENODEV;
if (!intel_huc_is_supported(huc))
return -ENOEXEC;
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list