[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm: Complain if drivers still use the ->load callback

[Daniel Vetter]

Kinda time to get this sorted. The locking around this really is not
nice.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 6 ++++++
 include/drm/drm_drv.h     | 3 +++
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
index 7c18a980cd4b..8deff75b484c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
@@ -948,6 +948,12 @@ int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags)
 
 	mutex_lock(&drm_global_mutex);
 
+	if (dev->driver->load) {
+		if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_LEGACY))
+			DRM_INFO("drm driver %s is using deprecated ->load callback\n",
+				 dev->driver->name);
+	}
+
 	ret = drm_minor_register(dev, DRM_MINOR_RENDER);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_minors;
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_drv.h b/include/drm/drm_drv.h
index 77685ed7aa65..77bc63de0a91 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_drv.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_drv.h
@@ -173,6 +173,9 @@ struct drm_driver {
 	 *
 	 * This is deprecated, do not use!
 	 *
+	 * FIXME: A few non-DRIVER_LEGACY drivers still use this, and should be
+	 * converted.
+	 *
 	 * Returns:
 	 *
 	 * Zero on success, non-zero value on failure.
-- 
2.24.1