[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Skip rmw for masked registers
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Jan 30 22:03:32 UTC 2020
A masked register does not need rmw to update, and it is best not to use
such a sequence.
Reported-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 32 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
index 5a7db279f702..e4c2b6d42f46 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
@@ -116,7 +116,8 @@ static void _wa_add(struct i915_wa_list *wal, const struct i915_wa *wa)
} else {
wa_ = &wal->list[mid];
- if ((wa->mask & ~wa_->mask) == 0) {
+ if ((wa->mask | wa_->mask) &&
+ (wa->mask & ~wa_->mask) == 0) {
DRM_ERROR("Discarding overwritten w/a for reg %04x (mask: %08x, value: %08x)\n",
i915_mmio_reg_offset(wa_->reg),
wa_->mask, wa_->val);
@@ -167,12 +168,6 @@ wa_write_masked_or(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 mask,
wa_add(wal, reg, mask, val, mask);
}
-static void
-wa_masked_en(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 val)
-{
- wa_write_masked_or(wal, reg, val, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(val));
-}
-
static void
wa_write(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 val)
{
@@ -185,14 +180,26 @@ wa_write_or(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 val)
wa_write_masked_or(wal, reg, val, val);
}
+static void
+wa_masked_en(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 val)
+{
+ wa_add(wal, reg, 0, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(val), val);
+}
+
+static void
+wa_masked_dis(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg, u32 val)
+{
+ wa_add(wal, reg, 0, _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(val), val);
+}
+
#define WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(addr, mask) \
- wa_write_masked_or(wal, (addr), (mask), _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(mask))
+ wa_masked_en(wal, (addr), mask)
#define WA_CLR_BIT_MASKED(addr, mask) \
- wa_write_masked_or(wal, (addr), (mask), _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(mask))
+ wa_masked_dis(wal, (addr), mask)
#define WA_SET_FIELD_MASKED(addr, mask, value) \
- wa_write_masked_or(wal, (addr), (mask), _MASKED_FIELD((mask), (value)))
+ wa_write_masked_or(wal, (addr), 0, _MASKED_FIELD((mask), (value)))
static void gen8_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
struct i915_wa_list *wal)
@@ -1020,7 +1027,10 @@ wa_list_apply(struct intel_uncore *uncore, const struct i915_wa_list *wal)
intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(uncore, fw);
for (i = 0, wa = wal->list; i < wal->count; i++, wa++) {
- intel_uncore_rmw_fw(uncore, wa->reg, wa->mask, wa->val);
+ if (wa->mask)
+ intel_uncore_rmw_fw(uncore, wa->reg, wa->mask, wa->val);
+ else
+ intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, wa->reg, wa->val);
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM))
wa_verify(wa,
intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, wa->reg),
--
2.25.0
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list