[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915/display: start description-based ddi initialization
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Wed Jul 1 14:20:17 UTC 2020
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com> wrote:
> Start adding per-platform relevant data into a table that we use for
> initialization. Intention is to keep the different indexes we need (e.g.
> phy, vbt, ddi, etc) and any other differences for each platform in these
> tables so we don't have to keep converting back and forth between them.
>
> For now, just add the naked table with name. Subsequent patches will
> start piping this in via intel_ddi_init().
>
> v2: do not try to generalize the checks for port presence nor dsi
> initialization. Instead focus on getting the ddi table created for all
> platforms using DDI and keep their differences in the original function
I like this.
> drm/i915/display: description-based initialization for remaining ddi
> platforms
Stray line?
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 141 ++++++++++++------
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 5 +
> 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index effd6b65f270..c234b50212b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -16805,6 +16805,83 @@ static void intel_pps_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(dev_priv);
> }
>
> +static const struct intel_ddi_port_info rkl_ports[] = {
> + { .name = "DDI A", .port = PORT_A },
> + { .name = "DDI B", .port = PORT_B },
> + { .name = "DDI TC1", .port = PORT_D },
> + { .name = "DDI TC2", .port = PORT_E },
> + { .port = PORT_NONE }
> +};
> +
> +static const struct intel_ddi_port_info tgl_ports[] = {
> + { .name = "DDI A", .port = PORT_A },
> + { .name = "DDI B", .port = PORT_B },
> + { .name = "DDI TC1", .port = PORT_D },
> + { .name = "DDI TC2", .port = PORT_E },
> + { .name = "DDI TC3", .port = PORT_F },
> + { .name = "DDI TC4", .port = PORT_G },
> + { .name = "DDI TC5", .port = PORT_H },
> + { .name = "DDI TC6", .port = PORT_I },
> + { .port = PORT_NONE }
> +};
> +
> +static const struct intel_ddi_port_info ehl_ports[] = {
> + { .name = "DDI A", .port = PORT_A },
> + { .name = "DDI B", .port = PORT_B },
> + { .name = "DDI C", .port = PORT_C },
> + { .name = "DDI D", .port = PORT_D },
> + { .port = PORT_NONE }
> +};
> +
> +static const struct intel_ddi_port_info icl_ports[] = {
> + { .name = "DDI A", .port = PORT_A },
> + { .name = "DDI B", .port = PORT_B },
> + { .name = "DDI TC1", .port = PORT_C },
> + { .name = "DDI TC2", .port = PORT_D },
> + { .name = "DDI TC3", .port = PORT_E },
> + { .name = "DDI TC4", .port = PORT_F },
> + { .port = PORT_NONE }
> +};
> +
> +static const struct intel_ddi_port_info gen9lp_ports[] = {
> + { .name = "DDI A", .port = PORT_A },
> + { .name = "DDI B", .port = PORT_B },
> + { .name = "DDI C", .port = PORT_C },
> + { .port = PORT_NONE }
> +};
> +
> +static const struct intel_ddi_port_info ddi_ports[] = {
> + { .name = "DDI A", .port = PORT_A },
> + { .name = "DDI B", .port = PORT_B },
> + { .name = "DDI C", .port = PORT_C },
> + { .name = "DDI D", .port = PORT_D },
> + { .name = "DDI E", .port = PORT_E },
> + { .name = "DDI F", .port = PORT_F },
> + { .port = PORT_NONE }
> +};
These make me wonder about a potential future restructuring of moving
the output setup stuff to a separate file. No need to do that here, just
throwing ideas around.
> +
> +/*
> + * Use a description-based approach for platforms that can be supported with a
> + * static table
> + *
> + * @disable_mask: any port that should not be enabled due to being disabled by
> + * any reason
> + */
> +static void setup_ddi_outputs_desc(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> + const struct intel_ddi_port_info *ports,
> + unsigned long disable_mask)
> +{
> + const struct intel_ddi_port_info *port_info;
> +
> + for (port_info = ports;
> + port_info->port != PORT_NONE; port_info++) {
> + if (test_bit(port_info->port, &disable_mask))
> + continue;
> +
> + intel_ddi_init(i915, port_info->port);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> @@ -16816,46 +16893,21 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> return;
>
> if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D); /* DDI TC1 */
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E); /* DDI TC2 */
> + setup_ddi_outputs_desc(dev_priv, rkl_ports, 0);
> } else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_F);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_G);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_H);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_I);
> + setup_ddi_outputs_desc(dev_priv, tgl_ports, 0);
> icl_dsi_init(dev_priv);
> } else if (IS_ELKHARTLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
> + setup_ddi_outputs_desc(dev_priv, ehl_ports, 0);
> icl_dsi_init(dev_priv);
> } else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 11)) {
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_F);
> + setup_ddi_outputs_desc(dev_priv, icl_ports, 0);
> icl_dsi_init(dev_priv);
> } else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> - /*
> - * FIXME: Broxton doesn't support port detection via the
> - * DDI_BUF_CTL_A or SFUSE_STRAP registers, find another way to
> - * detect the ports.
> - */
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
> -
> + setup_ddi_outputs_desc(dev_priv, gen9lp_ports, 0);
> vlv_dsi_init(dev_priv);
> } else if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
> + unsigned long disable_mask = 0;
> int found;
>
> if (intel_ddi_crt_present(dev_priv))
> @@ -16869,28 +16921,23 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> */
> found = intel_de_read(dev_priv, DDI_BUF_CTL(PORT_A)) & DDI_INIT_DISPLAY_DETECTED;
> /* WaIgnoreDDIAStrap: skl */
> - if (found || IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv))
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
> + if (!found && !IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv))
> + disable_mask |= BIT(PORT_A);
>
> /* DDI B, C, D, and F detection is indicated by the SFUSE_STRAP
> * register */
> found = intel_de_read(dev_priv, SFUSE_STRAP);
>
> - if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIB_DETECTED)
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
> - if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIC_DETECTED)
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
> - if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDID_DETECTED)
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
> - if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIF_DETECTED)
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_F);
> - /*
> - * On SKL we don't have a way to detect DDI-E so we rely on VBT.
> - */
> - if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv) &&
> - intel_bios_is_port_present(dev_priv, PORT_E))
> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
> + if (!(found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIB_DETECTED))
> + disable_mask |= BIT(PORT_B);
> + if (!(found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIC_DETECTED))
> + disable_mask |= BIT(PORT_C);
> + if (!(found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDID_DETECTED))
> + disable_mask |= BIT(PORT_D);
> + if (!(found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIF_DETECTED))
> + disable_mask |= BIT(PORT_F);
>
> + setup_ddi_outputs_desc(dev_priv, ddi_ports, disable_mask);
> } else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv)) {
> int found;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> index 4b0aaa3081c9..92cc7fc66bce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> @@ -1433,6 +1433,11 @@ struct intel_dp_mst_encoder {
> struct intel_connector *connector;
> };
>
> +struct intel_ddi_port_info {
Just thinking out loud, should we have a "struct port" or "struct
intel_port" instead. Maybe, maybe not. *shrug*
Anyway the patch is
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> + const char *name;
> + enum port port;
> +};
> +
> static inline enum dpio_channel
> vlv_dport_to_channel(struct intel_digital_port *dport)
> {
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list