[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Don't taint when using fault injection

Michał Winiarski michal at hardline.pl
Mon Jul 6 14:01:25 UTC 2020


From: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski at intel.com>

It is not really unexpected to hit wedge on init this way.
We're already downgrading error printk when running with fault injection,
let's use the same approach for CI tainting.

Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski at intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
index 82fada1e7552..d84c23592942 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
@@ -438,7 +438,9 @@ static inline const char *enableddisabled(bool v)
 
 static inline void __add_taint_for_CI(unsigned int taint)
 {
-	add_taint(taint, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
+	/* Failures that occur during fault injection testing are expected */
+	if (!i915_error_injected())
+		add_taint(taint, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
 }
 
 static inline void
-- 
2.27.0



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list