[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 11/15] pwm: crc: Implement get_state() method

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 6/22/20 9:57 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 02:17:54PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Implement the pwm_ops.get_state() method to complete the support for the
>> new atomic PWM API.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Add Andy's Reviewed-by tag
>> - Remove extra whitespace to align some code after assignments (requested by
>>    Uwe Kleine-König)
>> ---
>>   drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
>> index 8a7f4707279c..b311354d40a3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
>> @@ -119,8 +119,37 @@ static int crc_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static void crc_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>> +			       struct pwm_state *state)
>> +{
>> +	struct crystalcove_pwm *crc_pwm = to_crc_pwm(chip);
>> +	struct device *dev = crc_pwm->chip.dev;
>> +	unsigned int clk_div, clk_div_reg, duty_cycle_reg;
>> +	int error;
>> +
>> +	error = regmap_read(crc_pwm->regmap, PWM0_CLK_DIV, &clk_div_reg);
>> +	if (error) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "Error reading PWM0_CLK_DIV %d\n", error);
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	error = regmap_read(crc_pwm->regmap, PWM0_DUTY_CYCLE, &duty_cycle_reg);
>> +	if (error) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "Error reading PWM0_DUTY_CYCLE %d\n", error);
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	clk_div = (clk_div_reg & ~PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE) + 1;
>> +
>> +	state->period = clk_div * NSEC_PER_USEC * 256 / PWM_BASE_CLK_MHZ;
>> +	state->duty_cycle = duty_cycle_reg * state->period / PWM_MAX_LEVEL;
> 
> Please round up here.

Ok, I can fix that for the next version of this patch-set. Before I
post a new version of this patch-set, you have only responded to
some of the PWM patches in this set. Do you have any remarks on the
other PWM patches ?

Regards,

Hans