[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/hdcp: Update CP as per the kernel internal state

[Ramalingam C]

On 2020-07-08 at 13:55:16 +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
> On 2020-07-01 at 13:31:18 +0530, Shankar, Uma wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 3:30 PM
> > > > To: Gupta, Anshuman <anshuman.gupta at intel.com>; intel-
> > > > gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > Cc: Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar at intel.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/hdcp: Update CP as per
> > > > the kernel internal state
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Uma, is the R-b still valid? It's been a while.
> > > 
> > > Yeah Jani, the changes look good. Will need a rebase and fresh CI results though.
> > 
> > Seems the CI results are already out and we are clean.
> Hi Ram ,
> CI results are clean for this rebase patch,
> Could you please help with merging,
Pushed into dinq. Thanks for the change.

-Ram
> I belive your RB's are valid either-way wrt to your comment.
> Thanks,
> Anshuman Gupta.
> 
> > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Uma Shankar
> > > 
> > > > BR,
> > > > Jani.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 30 Jun 2020, Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta at intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > Content Protection property should be updated as per the kernel
> > > > > internal state. Let's say if Content protection is disabled by
> > > > > userspace, CP property should be set to UNDESIRED so that
> > > > > reauthentication will not happen until userspace request it again,
> > > > > but when kernel disables the HDCP due to any DDI disabling sequences
> > > > > like modeset/DPMS operation, kernel should set the property to
> > > > > DESIRED, so that when opportunity arises, kernel will start the HDCP
> > > > > authentication on its own.
> > > > >
> > > > > Somewhere in the line, state machine to set content protection to
> > > > > DESIRED from kernel was broken and IGT coverage was missing for it.
> > > > > This patch fixes it.
> > > > >
> > > > > v2:
> > > > > - Fixing hdcp CP state in connector atomic check function
> > > > >   intel_hdcp_atomic_check(). [Maarten]
> > > > >   This will require to check hdcp->value in intel_hdcp_update_pipe()
> > > > >   in order to avoid enabling hdcp, if it was already enabled.
> > > > >
> > > > > v3:
> > > > > - Rebased.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c at intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar at intel.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta at intel.com>
> > > > > Link:
> > > > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/350962/?series=72664&rev=2
> > > > > #v1
> > > > > Link:
> > > > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/359396/?series=72251&rev=3
> > > > > #v2
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 27
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++----
> > > > >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > > > index 815b054bb167..0d410652e194 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > > > @@ -2086,6 +2086,7 @@ void intel_hdcp_update_pipe(struct
> > > > intel_atomic_state *state,
> > > > >  		(conn_state->hdcp_content_type != hdcp->content_type &&
> > > > >  		 conn_state->content_protection !=
> > > > >  		 DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_UNDESIRED);
> > > > > +	bool desired_and_not_enabled = false;
> > > > >
> > > > >  	/*
> > > > >  	 * During the HDCP encryption session if Type change is requested,
> > > > > @@ -2108,8 +2109,15 @@ void intel_hdcp_update_pipe(struct
> > > > intel_atomic_state *state,
> > > > >  	}
> > > > >
> > > > >  	if (conn_state->content_protection ==
> > > > > -	    DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED ||
> > > > > -	    content_protection_type_changed)
> > > > > +	    DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED) {
> > > > > +		mutex_lock(&hdcp->mutex);
> > > > > +		/* Avoid enabling hdcp, if it already ENABLED */
> > > > > +		desired_and_not_enabled =
> > > > > +			hdcp->value !=
> > > > DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED;
> > > > > +		mutex_unlock(&hdcp->mutex);
> > > > > +	}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	if (desired_and_not_enabled || content_protection_type_changed)
> > > > >  		intel_hdcp_enable(connector,
> > > > >  				  crtc_state->cpu_transcoder,
> > > > >  				  (u8)conn_state->hdcp_content_type);
> > > > > @@ -2158,6 +2166,19 @@ void intel_hdcp_atomic_check(struct
> > > > drm_connector *connector,
> > > > >  		return;
> > > > >  	}
> > > > >
> > > > > +	crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(new_state->state,
> > > > > +						   new_state->crtc);
> > > > > +	/*
> > > > > +	 * Fix the HDCP uapi content protection state in case of modeset.
> > > > > +	 * FIXME: As per HDCP content protection property uapi doc, an uevent()
> > > > > +	 * need to be sent if there is transition from ENABLED->DESIRED.
> > > > > +	 */
> > > > > +	if (drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(crtc_state) &&
> > > > > +	    (old_cp == DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_ENABLED &&
> > > > > +	    new_cp != DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_UNDESIRED))
> > > > > +		new_state->content_protection =
> > > > > +			DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_DESIRED;
> > > > > +
> > > > >  	/*
> > > > >  	 * Nothing to do if the state didn't change, or HDCP was activated since
> > > > >  	 * the last commit. And also no change in hdcp content type.
> > > > > @@ -2170,8 +2191,6 @@ void intel_hdcp_atomic_check(struct
> > > > > drm_connector
> > > > *connector,
> > > > >  			return;
> > > > >  	}
> > > > >
> > > > > -	crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(new_state->state,
> > > > > -						   new_state->crtc);
> > > > >  	crtc_state->mode_changed = true;
> > > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx