[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/perf: Whitelist OA report trigger registers
Lionel Landwerlin
lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com
Fri Jul 17 08:01:10 UTC 2020
On 17/07/2020 04:57, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> From: Piotr Maciejewski <piotr.maciejewski at intel.com>
>
> OA reports can be triggered into the OA buffer by writing into the
> OAREPORTTRIG registers. Whitelist the registers to allow user to trigger
> reports.
>
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Maciejewski <piotr.maciejewski at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> index 5726cd0a37e0..582a2c8cd219 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> @@ -1365,6 +1365,20 @@ whitelist_reg(struct i915_wa_list *wal, i915_reg_t reg)
> whitelist_reg_ext(wal, reg, RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_ACCESS_RW);
> }
>
> +static void gen9_whitelist_build_performance_counters(struct i915_wa_list *w)
> +{
> + /* OA buffer trigger report 2/6 used by performance query */
> + whitelist_reg(w, OAREPORTTRIG2);
> + whitelist_reg(w, OAREPORTTRIG6);
> +}
> +
> +static void gen12_whitelist_build_performance_counters(struct i915_wa_list *w)
> +{
> + /* OA buffer trigger report 2/6 used by performance query */
> + whitelist_reg(w, GEN12_OAG_OAREPORTTRIG2);
> + whitelist_reg(w, GEN12_OAG_OAREPORTTRIG6);
> +}
> +
> static void gen9_whitelist_build(struct i915_wa_list *w)
> {
> /* WaVFEStateAfterPipeControlwithMediaStateClear:skl,bxt,glk,cfl */
> @@ -1378,6 +1392,9 @@ static void gen9_whitelist_build(struct i915_wa_list *w)
>
> /* WaSendPushConstantsFromMMIO:skl,bxt */
> whitelist_reg(w, COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN2);
> +
> + /* Performance counters support */
> + gen9_whitelist_build_performance_counters(w);
> }
>
> static void skl_whitelist_build(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> @@ -1471,6 +1488,9 @@ static void cnl_whitelist_build(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>
> /* WaEnablePreemptionGranularityControlByUMD:cnl */
> whitelist_reg(w, GEN8_CS_CHICKEN1);
> +
> + /* Performance counters support */
> + gen9_whitelist_build_performance_counters(w);
> }
>
> static void icl_whitelist_build(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> @@ -1500,6 +1520,9 @@ static void icl_whitelist_build(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> whitelist_reg_ext(w, PS_INVOCATION_COUNT,
> RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_ACCESS_RD |
> RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_RANGE_4);
> +
> + /* Performance counters support */
> + gen9_whitelist_build_performance_counters(w);
> break;
>
> case VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS:
> @@ -1550,6 +1573,9 @@ static void tgl_whitelist_build(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>
> /* Wa_1806527549:tgl */
> whitelist_reg(w, HIZ_CHICKEN);
> +
> + /* Performance counters support */
> + gen12_whitelist_build_performance_counters(w);
> break;
> default:
> whitelist_reg_ext(w,
Since this is a i915-perf feature, I think we should bump the i915-perf
revision number.
This will allow the IGT test to properly check the availability of this
feature and skip otherwise.
Otherwise looks sound to me.
-Lionel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list