[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/66] drm/i915: Skip taking acquire mutex for no ref->active callback
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Fri Jul 17 12:04:36 UTC 2020
On 15/07/2020 12:50, Chris Wilson wrote:
> If no active callback is defined for i915_active, we do not need to
> serialise its enabling with the mutex. We still do only want to call the
> debug activate once, and must still serialise with a concurrent retire.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> index d960d0be5bd2..841b5c30950a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> @@ -416,6 +416,14 @@ bool i915_active_acquire_if_busy(struct i915_active *ref)
> return atomic_add_unless(&ref->count, 1, 0);
> }
>
> +static void __i915_active_activate(struct i915_active *ref)
> +{
> + spin_lock_irq(&ref->tree_lock); /* __active_retire() */
> + if (!atomic_fetch_inc(&ref->count))
> + debug_active_activate(ref);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&ref->tree_lock);
> +}
> +
> int i915_active_acquire(struct i915_active *ref)
> {
> int err;
> @@ -423,23 +431,22 @@ int i915_active_acquire(struct i915_active *ref)
> if (i915_active_acquire_if_busy(ref))
> return 0;
>
> + if (!ref->active) {
> + __i915_active_activate(ref);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&ref->mutex);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> if (likely(!i915_active_acquire_if_busy(ref))) {
> - if (ref->active)
> - err = ref->active(ref);
> - if (!err) {
> - spin_lock_irq(&ref->tree_lock); /* __active_retire() */
> - debug_active_activate(ref);
> - atomic_inc(&ref->count);
> - spin_unlock_irq(&ref->tree_lock);
> - }
> + err = ref->active(ref);
> + if (!err)
> + __i915_active_activate(ref);
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&ref->mutex);
> -
Blank line was nice there.
> return err;
> }
>
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list