[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/gt: Move intel_breadcrumbs_arm_irq earlier
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Jul 20 09:23:08 UTC 2020
Move the __intel_breadcrumbs_arm_irq earlier, next to the disarm_irq, so
that we can make use of it in the following patch.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 88 ++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c
index 621cf9d1d7ad..d6008034869f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -54,6 +54,37 @@ static void irq_disable(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
spin_unlock(&engine->gt->irq_lock);
}
+static void __intel_breadcrumbs_arm_irq(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&b->irq_lock);
+
+ if (b->irq_armed)
+ return;
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!b->irq_engine);
+ if (!intel_gt_pm_get_if_awake(b->irq_engine->gt))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * The breadcrumb irq will be disarmed on the interrupt after the
+ * waiters are signaled. This gives us a single interrupt window in
+ * which we can add a new waiter and avoid the cost of re-enabling
+ * the irq.
+ */
+ WRITE_ONCE(b->irq_armed, true);
+
+ /*
+ * Since we are waiting on a request, the GPU should be busy
+ * and should have its own rpm reference. This is tracked
+ * by i915->gt.awake, we can forgo holding our own wakref
+ * for the interrupt as before i915->gt.awake is released (when
+ * the driver is idle) we disarm the breadcrumbs.
+ */
+
+ if (!b->irq_enabled++)
+ irq_enable(b->irq_engine);
+}
+
static void __intel_breadcrumbs_disarm_irq(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&b->irq_lock);
@@ -69,19 +100,6 @@ static void __intel_breadcrumbs_disarm_irq(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
intel_gt_pm_put_async(b->irq_engine->gt);
}
-void intel_breadcrumbs_park(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
-
- if (!READ_ONCE(b->irq_armed))
- return;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&b->irq_lock, flags);
- if (b->irq_armed)
- __intel_breadcrumbs_disarm_irq(b);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->irq_lock, flags);
-}
-
static inline bool __request_completed(const struct i915_request *rq)
{
return i915_seqno_passed(__hwsp_seqno(rq), rq->fence.seqno);
@@ -215,37 +233,6 @@ static void signal_irq_work(struct irq_work *work)
}
}
-static void __intel_breadcrumbs_arm_irq(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
-{
- lockdep_assert_held(&b->irq_lock);
-
- if (b->irq_armed)
- return;
-
- GEM_BUG_ON(!b->irq_engine);
- if (!intel_gt_pm_get_if_awake(b->irq_engine->gt))
- return;
-
- /*
- * The breadcrumb irq will be disarmed on the interrupt after the
- * waiters are signaled. This gives us a single interrupt window in
- * which we can add a new waiter and avoid the cost of re-enabling
- * the irq.
- */
- WRITE_ONCE(b->irq_armed, true);
-
- /*
- * Since we are waiting on a request, the GPU should be busy
- * and should have its own rpm reference. This is tracked
- * by i915->gt.awake, we can forgo holding our own wakref
- * for the interrupt as before i915->gt.awake is released (when
- * the driver is idle) we disarm the breadcrumbs.
- */
-
- if (!b->irq_enabled++)
- irq_enable(b->irq_engine);
-}
-
struct intel_breadcrumbs *
intel_breadcrumbs_create(struct intel_engine_cs *irq_engine)
{
@@ -285,6 +272,19 @@ void intel_breadcrumbs_reset(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->irq_lock, flags);
}
+void intel_breadcrumbs_park(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (!READ_ONCE(b->irq_armed))
+ return;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&b->irq_lock, flags);
+ if (b->irq_armed)
+ __intel_breadcrumbs_disarm_irq(b);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->irq_lock, flags);
+}
+
void intel_breadcrumbs_free(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
{
kfree(b);
--
2.20.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list