[Intel-gfx] [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf.rst: Document why indefinite fences are a bad idea
Thomas Hellström (Intel)
thomas_os at shipmail.org
Mon Jul 20 11:15:17 UTC 2020
Hi,
On 7/9/20 2:33 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Comes up every few years, gets somewhat tedious to discuss, let's
> write this down once and for all.
>
> What I'm not sure about is whether the text should be more explicit in
> flat out mandating the amdkfd eviction fences for long running compute
> workloads or workloads where userspace fencing is allowed.
Although (in my humble opinion) it might be possible to completely
untangle kernel-introduced fences for resource management and dma-fences
used for completion- and dependency tracking and lift a lot of
restrictions for the dma-fences, including prohibiting infinite ones, I
think this makes sense describing the current state.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom at intel.com>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list