[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: TPS4 PHY test pattern compliance support
Almahallawy, Khaled
khaled.almahallawy at intel.com
Tue Jul 21 00:20:57 UTC 2020
On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 17:11 -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 04:41:26PM -0700, Khaled Almahallawy wrote:
> > Adding support for TPS4 (CP2520 Pattern 3) PHY pattern source
> > tests.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Khaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 ++++
> > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > index d6295eb20b63..effadc096740 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -5371,7 +5371,7 @@ static void
> > intel_dp_phy_pattern_update(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > &intel_dp->compliance.test_data.phytest;
> > struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(dig_port-
> > >base.base.crtc);
> > enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> > - u32 pattern_val;
> > + u32 pattern_val, dp_tp_ctl;
> >
> > switch (data->phy_pattern) {
> > case DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN_NONE:
> > @@ -5411,7 +5411,7 @@ static void
> > intel_dp_phy_pattern_update(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_ENABLE |
> > DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_CUSTOM80);
> > break;
> > - case DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN_CP2520:
> > + case DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN_CP2520_PAT1:
> > /*
> > * FIXME: Ideally pattern should come from DPCD 0x24A.
> > As
> > * current firmware of DPR-100 could not set it, so
> > hardcoding
> > @@ -5423,6 +5423,16 @@ static void
> > intel_dp_phy_pattern_update(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_ENABLE |
> > DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_HBR2 |
> > pattern_val);
> > break;
> > + case DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN_CP2520_PAT3:
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Set TPS4 Phy Test Pattern\n");
> > + intel_de_write(dev_priv, DDI_DP_COMP_CTL(pipe),
> > 0x0);
> > + dp_tp_ctl = intel_de_read(dev_priv,
> > TGL_DP_TP_CTL(pipe));
> > + dp_tp_ctl &= ~DP_TP_CTL_TRAIN_PAT4_SEL_MASK;
> > + dp_tp_ctl |= DP_TP_CTL_TRAIN_PAT4_SEL_TS4a;
> > + dp_tp_ctl &= ~DP_TP_CTL_LINK_TRAIN_MASK;
> > + dp_tp_ctl |= DP_TP_CTL_LINK_TRAIN_PAT4;
> > + intel_de_write(dev_priv, TGL_DP_TP_CTL(pipe),
> > dp_tp_ctl);
> > + break;
> > default:
> > WARN(1, "Invalid Phy Test Pattern\n");
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index a0d31f3bf634..a4607bd1ac26 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -9982,6 +9982,10 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
> > #define DP_TP_CTL_MODE_SST (0 << 27)
> > #define DP_TP_CTL_MODE_MST (1 << 27)
> > #define DP_TP_CTL_FORCE_ACT (1 << 25)
> > +#define DP_TP_CTL_TRAIN_PAT4_SEL_MASK (3 << 19)
> > +#define DP_TP_CTL_TRAIN_PAT4_SEL_TS4a (0 << 19)
> > +#define DP_TP_CTL_TRAIN_PAT4_SEL_TP4b (1 << 19)
> > +#define DP_TP_CTL_TRAIN_PAT4_SEL_TP4c (2 << 19)
>
> The bspec calls them Training Pattern 4a/b/c, why is it _TS4a. TP4b,
> TP4c?
> We shd make it uniform, all TP4a/b/c perhaps?
Apology,will fix to TP4a/b/c then
>
> Manasi
>
> > #define DP_TP_CTL_ENHANCED_FRAME_ENABLE (1 << 18)
> > #define DP_TP_CTL_FDI_AUTOTRAIN (1 << 15)
> > #define DP_TP_CTL_LINK_TRAIN_MASK (7 << 8)
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list