[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Stall around xcs invalidations on tgl
Mika Kuoppala
mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com
Fri Jul 24 07:38:56 UTC 2020
Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> Whether this is an arbitrary stall or a vital ingredient, neverthess the
> impact is noticeable. If we do not have the stall around the xcs
> invalidation before a request, writes within that request sometimes go
> astray.
>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2169
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> index 353b1717fe84..7d914527d236 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -4761,10 +4761,12 @@ static int gen12_emit_flush_render(struct i915_request *request,
>
> static int gen12_emit_flush(struct i915_request *request, u32 mode)
> {
> +#define WA_CNT 16 /* Magic delay or size of some internal pipelined buffer? */
Odd, very odd indeed.
I looked at the selftest in question. For completeness, there should be
READ_ONCE on where the hwsp is read, but that is just a makeup.
But how about forcing the write completion check on, on the actual
write to the hwsp? It is enabled with bit 10.
-Mika
> intel_engine_mask_t aux_inv = 0;
> u32 cmd, *cs;
> + int n;
>
> - cmd = 4;
> + cmd = 4 * WA_CNT;
> if (mode & EMIT_INVALIDATE)
> cmd += 2;
> if (mode & EMIT_INVALIDATE)
> @@ -4781,7 +4783,8 @@ static int gen12_emit_flush(struct i915_request *request, u32 mode)
>
> cmd = MI_FLUSH_DW + 1;
>
> - /* We always require a command barrier so that subsequent
> + /*
> + * We always require a command barrier so that subsequent
> * commands, such as breadcrumb interrupts, are strictly ordered
> * wrt the contents of the write cache being flushed to memory
> * (and thus being coherent from the CPU).
> @@ -4794,10 +4797,12 @@ static int gen12_emit_flush(struct i915_request *request, u32 mode)
> cmd |= MI_INVALIDATE_BSD;
> }
>
> - *cs++ = cmd;
> - *cs++ = LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR;
> - *cs++ = 0; /* upper addr */
> - *cs++ = 0; /* value */
> + for (n = 0; n < WA_CNT; n++) {
> + *cs++ = cmd;
> + *cs++ = LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR;
> + *cs++ = 0; /* upper addr */
> + *cs++ = 0; /* value */
> + }
>
> if (aux_inv) { /* hsdes: 1809175790 */
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> @@ -4818,6 +4823,7 @@ static int gen12_emit_flush(struct i915_request *request, u32 mode)
> intel_ring_advance(request, cs);
>
> return 0;
> +#undef WA_CNT
> }
>
> static void assert_request_valid(struct i915_request *rq)
> --
> 2.20.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list