[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 10/16] pwm: crc: Enable/disable PWM output on enable/disable

Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com
Wed Jul 29 10:32:21 UTC 2020


On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 03:37:47PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> The pwm-crc code is using 2 different enable bits:
> 1. bit 7 of the PWM0_CLK_DIV (PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE)
> 2. bit 0 of the BACKLIGHT_EN register
> 
> So far we've kept the PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE bit set when disabling the PWM,
> this commit makes crc_pwm_disable() clear it on disable and makes
> crc_pwm_enable() set it again on re-enable.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>

> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Remove paragraph about tri-stating the output from the commit message,
>   we don't have a datasheet so this was just an unfounded guess
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
> index 81232da0c767..b72008c9b072 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,9 @@ static int crc_pwm_calc_clk_div(int period_ns)
>  static int crc_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *c, struct pwm_device *pwm)
>  {
>  	struct crystalcove_pwm *crc_pwm = to_crc_pwm(c);
> +	int div = crc_pwm_calc_clk_div(pwm_get_period(pwm));
>  
> +	regmap_write(crc_pwm->regmap, PWM0_CLK_DIV, div | PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE);
>  	regmap_write(crc_pwm->regmap, BACKLIGHT_EN, 1);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -63,8 +65,10 @@ static int crc_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *c, struct pwm_device *pwm)
>  static void crc_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *c, struct pwm_device *pwm)
>  {
>  	struct crystalcove_pwm *crc_pwm = to_crc_pwm(c);
> +	int div = crc_pwm_calc_clk_div(pwm_get_period(pwm));
>  
>  	regmap_write(crc_pwm->regmap, BACKLIGHT_EN, 0);
> +	regmap_write(crc_pwm->regmap, PWM0_CLK_DIV, div);
>  }
>  
>  static int crc_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *c, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko




More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list