[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [01/36] drm/i915: Handle very early engine initialisation failure (rev2)

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Patchwork (2020-06-01 12:00:40)
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: series starting with [01/36] drm/i915: Handle very early engine initialisation failure (rev2)
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77857/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8560_full -> Patchwork_17828_full
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_17828_full absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in Patchwork_17828_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_17828_full:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt at runner@aborted:
>     - shard-hsw:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][1]
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17828/shard-hsw6/igt@runner@aborted.html
> 
>   
> #### Suppressed ####
> 
>   The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
>   They do not affect the overall result.
> 
>   * {igt at gem_exec_fence@parallel at vecs0}:
>     - shard-hsw:          [PASS][2] -> [FAIL][3] +3 similar issues
>    [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8560/shard-hsw1/igt@gem_exec_fence@parallel@vecs0.html
>    [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_17828/shard-hsw2/igt@gem_exec_fence@parallel@vecs0.html

Sigh. They dropped the memory compare from MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX in Haswell.
-Chris