[Intel-gfx] â Fi.CI.IGT: success for Remaining RKL patches
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Sat Jun 6 09:01:17 UTC 2020
Quoting Matt Roper (2020-06-06 04:21:37)
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 11:11:23PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Matt Roper (2020-06-04 17:39:16)
> > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 08:34:04AM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > > > == Series Details ==
> > > >
> > > > Series: Remaining RKL patches
> > > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77971/
> > > > State : success
> > > >
> > > > == Summary ==
> > > >
> > > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8579_full -> Patchwork_17859_full
> > > > ====================================================
> > > >
> > > > Summary
> > > > -------
> > > >
> > > > **SUCCESS**
> > > >
> > > > No regressions found.
> > >
> > > Patches #1, 6, 8, and 11 from this series applied to dinq since they have r-b's.
> >
> > This seems to have introduced
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8584/fi-skl-guc/igt@runner@aborted.html
>
> Thanks for pointing that out. I think it's because we lost DP-E
> matching in the VBT mapping table during the refactor. If so,
>
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/368948/?series=78060&rev=1
>
> should fix it.
It did indeed.
> Was there a gitlab bug for this failure?
Not yet.
-Chris
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list