[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/execlists: Lift opportunistic process_csb to before engine lock
Mika Kuoppala
mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com
Fri Jun 12 21:56:20 UTC 2020
Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> Since the process_csb() does not require us to hold the
> engine->active.lock, we can move the opportunistic flush before
> direction submission to outside of the lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> index 5ab0ed35af84..e866b8d721ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -3170,13 +3170,6 @@ static void __submit_queue_imm(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> if (reset_in_progress(execlists))
> return; /* defer until we restart the engine following reset */
>
> - /* Hopefully we clear execlists->pending[] to let us through */
> - if (READ_ONCE(execlists->pending[0]) &&
> - tasklet_trylock(&execlists->tasklet)) {
> - process_csb(engine);
> - tasklet_unlock(&execlists->tasklet);
> - }
> -
> __execlists_submission_tasklet(engine);
> }
>
> @@ -3199,11 +3192,25 @@ static bool ancestor_on_hold(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> return !list_empty(&engine->active.hold) && hold_request(rq);
> }
>
> +static void flush_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +{
> + struct intel_engine_execlists *el = &engine->execlists;
> +
> + if (READ_ONCE(el->pending[0]) && tasklet_trylock(&el->tasklet)) {
> + if (!reset_in_progress(el))
> + process_csb(engine);
> + tasklet_unlock(&el->tasklet);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void execlists_submit_request(struct i915_request *request)
> {
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine = request->engine;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> + /* Hopefully we clear execlists->pending[] to let us through */
> + flush_csb(engine);
> +
> /* Will be called from irq-context when using foreign fences. */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->active.lock, flags);
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list