[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 02/17] drm/i915: Clear the repeater bit on HDCP disable

[Sasha Levin]

Hi

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
fixing commit: ee5e5e7a5e0f ("drm/i915: Add HDCP framework + base implementation").

The bot has tested the following trees: v5.7.5, v5.4.48, v4.19.129.

v5.7.5: Build OK!
v5.4.48: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    692059318c0fc ("drm/i915/hdcp: Enable HDCP 1.4 and 2.2 on Gen12+")

v4.19.129: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    0e39037b31655 ("drm/i915: Cache the error string")
    16e4dd0342a80 ("drm/i915: Markup paired operations on wakerefs")
    39e2f501c1b43 ("drm/i915: Split struct intel_context definition to its own header")
    408bd91786665 ("drm/i915: extract intel_hdcp.h from intel_drv.h")
    52c0fdb25c7c9 ("drm/i915: Replace global breadcrumbs with per-context interrupt tracking")
    538ef96b9dae7 ("drm/i915/gem: Track the rpm wakerefs")
    692059318c0fc ("drm/i915/hdcp: Enable HDCP 1.4 and 2.2 on Gen12+")
    6b048706f407f ("drm/i915: Forcibly flush unwanted requests in drop-caches")
    87f1ef225242d ("drm/i915: Record the sseu configuration per-context & engine")
    95fd94a645f75 ("drm/i915: avoid rebuilding i915_gpu_error.o on version string updates")
    c0a6aa7ec2c36 ("drm/i915: Show actual alongside requested frequency in debugfs/i915_rps_boost_info")
    c2400ec3b6d15 ("drm/i915: add Makefile magic for testing headers are self-contained")
    c44301fce6146 ("drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6")
    e0516e83640e1 ("drm/i915: Move sandybride pcode access to intel_sideband.c")
    e1ef734eaec54 ("drm/i915: make intel_frontbuffer.h self-contained")
    e6154e4cb8b0d ("drm/i915: Skip the ERR_PTR error state")
    eb8d0f5af4ec2 ("drm/i915: Remove GPU reset dependence on struct_mutex")
    fb6f0b64e455b ("drm/i915: Prevent machine hang from Broxton's vtd w/a and error capture")


NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.

How should we proceed with this patch?

-- 
Thanks
Sasha