[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "dma-buf: Report signaled links inside dma-fence-chain"

[Sumit Semwal]

Hi Christian,

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, 18:10 Daniel Vetter, <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:03 AM Christian König
> <christian.koenig at amd.com> wrote:
> >
> > Am 26.06.20 um 06:43 schrieb Sumit Semwal:
> > > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 01:24, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > >> Ignoring everything else ...
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:28 PM Jani Nikula <
> jani.nikula at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >>> As a side note, there seem to be extra checks in place for acks when
> > >>> applying non-i915 patches to drm-intel; there are no such checks for
> > >>> drm-misc.
> > >> One option to generalize that that I pondered is to consult
> > >> get_maintainers.pl asking for git repo link, and if that returns
> > >> something else, then insist that there's an ack from a relevant
> > >> maintainer. It's a bit of typing, but I think the bigger problem is
> > >> that there's a ton of false positives.
> > > Right; for the particular patch, I wasn't even in the to: or cc: field
> > > and that made it slip from my radar. I would definitely ask any one
> > > sending patches for dma-buf directory to follow the get_maintainers.pl
> > > religiously.
> > >> But maybe that's a good thing, would give some motivation to keep
> > >> MAINTAINERS updated.
> >
> > Should I maybe add myself as maintainer as well? I've written enough
> > stuff in there to know the code quite a bit.
>
> I think that makes lots of sense, since defacto you already are :-)
>
> If you feel like bikeshed, get_maintainers.pl also supports R: for
> reviewer, but given that you also push patches to drm-misc M: for
> maintainer feels more accurate.
>

I think given you've been reviewing and changing most of the code around
dma-fences, it should be ok to add you as the maintainer for those bits?

-Daniel
>

Best,
Sumit.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20200626/e618a590/attachment.htm>