[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/tgl: Implement WA 18011464164
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Tue Jun 30 14:28:12 UTC 2020
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 02:20:58PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> This fix some possible corruptions.
>
> BSpec: 52755
> BSpec: 52890
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 8 +++++++-
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 284af0c6439c..797e036fa695 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -4170,6 +4170,9 @@ enum {
> #define INF_UNIT_LEVEL_CLKGATE _MMIO(0x9560)
> #define CGPSF_CLKGATE_DIS (1 << 3)
>
> +#define SLICE_UNIT_LEVEL_CLOCK_GATING_CTL _MMIO(0x94D8)
> +#define GS_UNIT_CLOCK_GATING_DIS REG_BIT(24)
> +
> /*
> * Display engine regs
> */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 2a32d6230795..86408173c435 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -7113,7 +7113,7 @@ static void tgl_init_clock_gating(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> I915_WRITE(POWERGATE_ENABLE,
> I915_READ(POWERGATE_ENABLE) | vd_pg_enable);
>
> - /* Wa_1409825376:tgl (pre-prod)*/
> + /* Wa_1409825376:tgl (pre-prod) */
> if (IS_TGL_REVID(dev_priv, TGL_REVID_A0, TGL_REVID_A0))
> I915_WRITE(GEN9_CLKGATE_DIS_3, I915_READ(GEN9_CLKGATE_DIS_3) |
> TGL_VRH_GATING_DIS);
> @@ -7121,6 +7121,12 @@ static void tgl_init_clock_gating(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> /* Wa_14011059788:tgl */
> intel_uncore_rmw(&dev_priv->uncore, GEN10_DFR_RATIO_EN_AND_CHICKEN,
> 0, DFR_DISABLE);
> +
> + /* Wa_18011464164:tgl */
> + if (IS_TGL_REVID(dev_priv, TGL_REVID_B0, TGL_REVID_B0))
> + intel_uncore_rmw(&dev_priv->uncore,
> + SLICE_UNIT_LEVEL_CLOCK_GATING_CTL, 0,
> + GS_UNIT_CLOCK_GATING_DIS);
This looks like a gt w/a, so shouldn't be here preobably. We also have
a very similarly named register already at 0x94d4, so the register
name probably needs some work too.
> }
>
> static void cnp_init_clock_gating(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> --
> 2.27.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list