[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/17] drm/i915/selftests: Apply a heavy handed flush to i915_active
Patchwork
patchwork at emeril.freedesktop.org
Fri Mar 6 21:13:47 UTC 2020
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [01/17] drm/i915/selftests: Apply a heavy handed flush to i915_active
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/74392/
State : warning
== Summary ==
$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
982908c93abd drm/i915/selftests: Apply a heavy handed flush to i915_active
031f94155df6 drm/i915/execlists: Enable timeslice on partial virtual engine dequeue
9b61d8749081 drm/i915: Improve the start alignment of bonded pairs
5d9fda3690f4 drm/i915: Tweak scheduler's kick_submission()
c0d1c65cb89a drm/i915: Wrap i915_active in a simple kreffed struct
3109c8f9d4d0 drm/i915: Extend i915_request_await_active to use all timelines
5ae4e5feccba drm/i915/perf: Schedule oa_config after modifying the contexts
d0db810d00b0 drm/i915/selftests: Add request throughput measurement to perf
-:90: WARNING:LINE_SPACING: Missing a blank line after declarations
#90: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c:1515:
+ struct intel_context *ce;
+ IGT_TIMEOUT(end_time);
-:157: WARNING:LINE_SPACING: Missing a blank line after declarations
#157: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c:1582:
+ struct intel_context *ce;
+ IGT_TIMEOUT(end_time);
-:213: WARNING:LINE_SPACING: Missing a blank line after declarations
#213: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c:1638:
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
+ static int (* const func[])(void *arg) = {
-:220: WARNING:LINE_SPACING: Missing a blank line after declarations
#220: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c:1645:
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
+ int (* const *fn)(void *arg);
-:265: WARNING:YIELD: Using yield() is generally wrong. See yield() kernel-doc (sched/core.c)
#265: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c:1690:
+ yield(); /* start all threads before we kthread_stop() */
total: 0 errors, 5 warnings, 0 checks, 306 lines checked
0a74ccdc875c dma-buf: Prettify typecasts for dma-fence-chain
3702ebf022c1 dma-buf: Report signaled links inside dma-fence-chain
e3df6c598dbd dma-buf: Exercise dma-fence-chain under selftests
-:33: WARNING:FILE_PATH_CHANGES: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#33:
new file mode 100644
-:61: CHECK:UNCOMMENTED_DEFINITION: spinlock_t definition without comment
#61: FILE: drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-chain.c:24:
+ spinlock_t lock;
-:235: WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'find_seqno', this function's name, in a string
#235: FILE: drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-chain.c:198:
+ pr_err("Reported %d for find_seqno(0)!\n", err);
-:244: WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'find_seqno', this function's name, in a string
#244: FILE: drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-chain.c:207:
+ pr_err("Reported %d for find_seqno(%d:%d)!\n",
-:249: WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'find_seqno', this function's name, in a string
#249: FILE: drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-chain.c:212:
+ pr_err("Incorrect fence reported by find_seqno(%d:%d)\n",
-:272: WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'find_seqno', this function's name, in a string
#272: FILE: drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-chain.c:235:
+ pr_err("Error not reported for future fence: find_seqno(%d:%d)!\n",
-:286: WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'find_seqno', this function's name, in a string
#286: FILE: drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-chain.c:249:
+ pr_err("Incorrect fence reported by find_seqno(%d:%d)\n",
-:737: WARNING:EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'dma_fence_chain', this function's name, in a string
#737: FILE: drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-chain.c:700:
+ pr_info("sizeof(dma_fence_chain)=%zu\n",
total: 0 errors, 7 warnings, 1 checks, 725 lines checked
dfcab52a6de6 dma-buf: Proxy fence, an unsignaled fence placeholder
-:45: WARNING:FILE_PATH_CHANGES: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#45:
new file mode 100644
-:93: CHECK:UNCOMMENTED_DEFINITION: spinlock_t definition without comment
#93: FILE: drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-proxy.c:18:
+ spinlock_t lock;
-:321: CHECK:UNCOMMENTED_DEFINITION: spinlock_t definition without comment
#321: FILE: drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-proxy.c:20:
+ spinlock_t lock;
-:481: WARNING:MEMORY_BARRIER: memory barrier without comment
#481: FILE: drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-proxy.c:180:
+ smp_store_mb(container_of(cb, struct simple_cb, cb)->seen, true);
total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 2 checks, 852 lines checked
72c5da66b118 drm/syncobj: Allow use of dma-fence-proxy
2bf6c69d342d drm/i915/gem: Teach execbuf how to wait on future syncobj
e7ace1917afa drm/i915/gem: Allow combining submit-fences with syncobj
232c8948625d drm/i915/gt: Declare when we enabled timeslicing
62e2ea9500a8 drm/i915/gt: Yield the timeslice if caught waiting on a user semaphore
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list