[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915/gmbus: convert to drm_device based logging,
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at intel.com
Tue Mar 10 08:52:44 UTC 2020
From: Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax at gmail.com>
Conversion instances of printk based drm logging macros to use the
struct drm_device based logging macros in i915/display/intel_gmbus.c.
This was done using the following coccinelle semantic patch that
transforms based on the existence of an existing drm_i915_private
device:
@@
identifier fn, T;
@@
fn(...,struct drm_i915_private *T,...) {
<+...
(
-DRM_INFO(
+drm_info(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_ERROR(
+drm_err(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_WARN(
+drm_warn(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG(
+drm_dbg(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(
+drm_dbg(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_KMS(
+drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC(
+drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm,
...)
)
...+>
}
@@
identifier fn, T;
@@
fn(...) {
...
struct drm_i915_private *T = ...;
<+...
(
-DRM_INFO(
+drm_info(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_ERROR(
+drm_err(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_WARN(
+drm_warn(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG(
+drm_dbg(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_KMS(
+drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(
+drm_dbg(&T->drm,
...)
|
-DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC(
+drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm,
...)
)
...+>
}
New checkpatch warnings were addressed manually.
Signed-off-by: Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax at gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c | 33 +++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
index 0aaaaac44973..1fd3a5a6296b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
@@ -631,8 +631,9 @@ do_gmbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num,
* till then let it sleep.
*/
if (gmbus_wait_idle(dev_priv)) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("GMBUS [%s] timed out waiting for idle\n",
- adapter->name);
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
+ "GMBUS [%s] timed out waiting for idle\n",
+ adapter->name);
ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
}
intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, GMBUS0, 0);
@@ -655,8 +656,9 @@ do_gmbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num,
*/
ret = -ENXIO;
if (gmbus_wait_idle(dev_priv)) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("GMBUS [%s] timed out after NAK\n",
- adapter->name);
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
+ "GMBUS [%s] timed out after NAK\n",
+ adapter->name);
ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
}
@@ -668,9 +670,9 @@ do_gmbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num,
intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, GMBUS1, 0);
intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, GMBUS0, 0);
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("GMBUS [%s] NAK for addr: %04x %c(%d)\n",
- adapter->name, msgs[i].addr,
- (msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD) ? 'r' : 'w', msgs[i].len);
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "GMBUS [%s] NAK for addr: %04x %c(%d)\n",
+ adapter->name, msgs[i].addr,
+ (msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD) ? 'r' : 'w', msgs[i].len);
/*
* Passive adapters sometimes NAK the first probe. Retry the first
@@ -679,16 +681,18 @@ do_gmbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num,
* drm_do_probe_ddc_edid, which bails out on the first -ENXIO.
*/
if (ret == -ENXIO && i == 0 && try++ == 0) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("GMBUS [%s] NAK on first message, retry\n",
- adapter->name);
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
+ "GMBUS [%s] NAK on first message, retry\n",
+ adapter->name);
goto retry;
}
goto out;
timeout:
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("GMBUS [%s] timed out, falling back to bit banging on pin %d\n",
- bus->adapter.name, bus->reg0 & 0xff);
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
+ "GMBUS [%s] timed out, falling back to bit banging on pin %d\n",
+ bus->adapter.name, bus->reg0 & 0xff);
intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, GMBUS0, 0);
/*
@@ -925,9 +929,10 @@ void intel_gmbus_force_bit(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, bool force_bit)
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->gmbus_mutex);
bus->force_bit += force_bit ? 1 : -1;
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%sabling bit-banging on %s. force bit now %d\n",
- force_bit ? "en" : "dis", adapter->name,
- bus->force_bit);
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
+ "%sabling bit-banging on %s. force bit now %d\n",
+ force_bit ? "en" : "dis", adapter->name,
+ bus->force_bit);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->gmbus_mutex);
}
--
2.20.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list