[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 1/2] drm/edid: Name the detailed monitor range flags

[Manasi Navare]

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 06:20:27PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 02:39:39PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > This patch adds defines for the detailed monitor
> > range flags as per the EDID specification.
> > 
> > v2:
> > * Rename the flags with DRM_EDID_ (Jani N)
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland at amd.com>
> > Cc: Clinton A Taylor <clinton.a.taylor at intel.com>
> > Cc: Kazlauskas Nicholas <Nicholas.Kazlauskas at amd.com>
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas at amd.com>
> > ---
> >  include/drm/drm_edid.h | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_edid.h b/include/drm/drm_edid.h
> > index f0b03d401c27..34b15e3d070c 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_edid.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_edid.h
> > @@ -91,6 +91,11 @@ struct detailed_data_string {
> >  	u8 str[13];
> >  } __attribute__((packed));
> >  
> > +#define DRM_EDID_DEFAULT_GTF_SUPPORT_FLAG   0x00
> > +#define DRM_EDID_RANGE_LIMITS_ONLY_FLAG     0x01
> > +#define DRM_EDID_SECONDARY_GTF_SUPPORT_FLAG 0x02
> > +#define DRM_EDID_CVT_SUPPORT_FLAG           0x04
> 
> No indication what flags thse are. Also missing the
> actual change to use them in drm_edid.c.
>

The name of the flag in #define indicates what flag it is, how else do you
want me to add teh indication?

I have done the change in my second patch to use this flag #define 
Use of these flags in other places in drm_edid.c will be follow up patches

SOunds good?

Manasi
 
> > +
> >  struct detailed_data_monitor_range {
> >  	u8 min_vfreq;
> >  	u8 max_vfreq;
> > -- 
> > 2.19.1
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel