[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v19 2/8] drm/i915: Introduce skl_plane_wm_level accessor.
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Wed Mar 11 16:07:27 UTC 2020
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 06:11:58PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> For future Gen12 SAGV implementation we need to
> seemlessly alter wm levels calculated, depending
> on whether we are allowed to enable SAGV or not.
>
> So this accessor will give additional flexibility
> to do that.
>
> Currently this accessor is still simply working
> as "pass-through" function. This will be changed
> in next coming patches from this series.
>
> v2: - plane_id -> plane->id(Ville Syrjälä)
> - Moved wm_level var to have more local scope
> (Ville Syrjälä)
> - Renamed yuv to color_plane(Ville Syrjälä) in
> skl_plane_wm_level
>
> v3: - plane->id -> plane_id(this time for real, Ville Syrjälä)
> - Changed colorplane id type from boolean to int as index
> (Ville Syrjälä)
> - Moved crtc_state param so that it is first now
> (Ville Syrjälä)
> - Moved wm_level declaration to tigher scope in
> skl_write_plane_wm(Ville Syrjälä)
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index c7928c870b0a..c72fa59a8302 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -4547,6 +4547,18 @@ icl_get_total_relative_data_rate(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> return total_data_rate;
> }
>
> +static const struct skl_wm_level *
> +skl_plane_wm_level(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> + enum plane_id plane_id,
> + int level,
> + int color_plane)
> +{
> + const struct skl_plane_wm *wm =
> + &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal.planes[plane_id];
> +
> + return color_plane == 0 ? &wm->wm[level] : &wm->uv_wm[level];
> +}
> +
> static int
> skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> @@ -4606,22 +4618,29 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> */
> for (level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev_priv); level >= 0; level--) {
> blocks = 0;
> +
> for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
> - const struct skl_plane_wm *wm =
> - &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal.planes[plane_id];
> + const struct skl_wm_level *wm_level;
> + const struct skl_wm_level *wm_uv_level;
> + int color_plane = 0;
These color_plane variables seems kinda pointless. I'd just pass 0/1 directly
(pretty sure that's what we do elsewhere too).
> +
> + wm_level = skl_plane_wm_level(crtc_state, plane_id,
> + level, color_plane);
> + wm_uv_level = skl_plane_wm_level(crtc_state, plane_id,
> + level, color_plane + 1);
>
> if (plane_id == PLANE_CURSOR) {
> - if (wm->wm[level].min_ddb_alloc > total[PLANE_CURSOR]) {
> + if (wm_level->min_ddb_alloc > total[PLANE_CURSOR]) {
> drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm,
> - wm->wm[level].min_ddb_alloc != U16_MAX);
> + wm_level->min_ddb_alloc != U16_MAX);
> blocks = U32_MAX;
> break;
> }
> continue;
> }
>
> - blocks += wm->wm[level].min_ddb_alloc;
> - blocks += wm->uv_wm[level].min_ddb_alloc;
> + blocks += wm_level->min_ddb_alloc;
> + blocks += wm_uv_level->min_ddb_alloc;
> }
>
> if (blocks <= alloc_size) {
> @@ -4644,10 +4663,16 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> * proportional to its relative data rate.
> */
> for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
> - const struct skl_plane_wm *wm =
> - &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal.planes[plane_id];
> + const struct skl_wm_level *wm_level;
> + const struct skl_wm_level *wm_uv_level;
> u64 rate;
> u16 extra;
> + int color_plane = 0;
> +
> + wm_level = skl_plane_wm_level(crtc_state, plane_id,
> + level, color_plane);
> + wm_uv_level = skl_plane_wm_level(crtc_state, plane_id,
> + level, color_plane + 1);
>
> if (plane_id == PLANE_CURSOR)
> continue;
> @@ -4663,7 +4688,7 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> extra = min_t(u16, alloc_size,
> DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(alloc_size * rate,
> total_data_rate));
> - total[plane_id] = wm->wm[level].min_ddb_alloc + extra;
> + total[plane_id] = wm_level->min_ddb_alloc + extra;
> alloc_size -= extra;
> total_data_rate -= rate;
>
> @@ -4674,7 +4699,7 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> extra = min_t(u16, alloc_size,
> DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(alloc_size * rate,
> total_data_rate));
> - uv_total[plane_id] = wm->uv_wm[level].min_ddb_alloc + extra;
> + uv_total[plane_id] = wm_uv_level->min_ddb_alloc + extra;
> alloc_size -= extra;
> total_data_rate -= rate;
> }
> @@ -4717,8 +4742,16 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> */
> for (level++; level <= ilk_wm_max_level(dev_priv); level++) {
> for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(crtc, plane_id) {
> + const struct skl_wm_level *wm_level;
> + const struct skl_wm_level *wm_uv_level;
> struct skl_plane_wm *wm =
> &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal.planes[plane_id];
> + int color_plane = 0;
> +
> + wm_level = skl_plane_wm_level(crtc_state, plane_id,
> + level, color_plane);
> + wm_uv_level = skl_plane_wm_level(crtc_state, plane_id,
> + level, color_plane + 1);
>
> /*
> * We only disable the watermarks for each plane if
> @@ -4732,9 +4765,10 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> * planes must be enabled before the level will be used."
> * So this is actually safe to do.
> */
> - if (wm->wm[level].min_ddb_alloc > total[plane_id] ||
> - wm->uv_wm[level].min_ddb_alloc > uv_total[plane_id])
> - memset(&wm->wm[level], 0, sizeof(wm->wm[level]));
> + if (wm_level->min_ddb_alloc > total[plane_id] ||
> + wm_uv_level->min_ddb_alloc > uv_total[plane_id])
> + memset(&wm->wm[level], 0,
> + sizeof(struct skl_wm_level));
memset(wm_level, 0, sizeof(*wm_level)) ?
Hmm. Also wondering why we're not clearing wm_uv here as well. I suppose
it might not mater since the hw doesn't use wm_uv (and I fixed the
"did the wms change?" check to ignore it too). Bit might be nice to clear
it for consistency. Should be a separate patch though.
>
> /*
> * Wa_1408961008:icl, ehl
> @@ -4742,9 +4776,14 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> */
> if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 11) &&
> level == 1 && wm->wm[0].plane_en) {
> - wm->wm[level].plane_res_b = wm->wm[0].plane_res_b;
> - wm->wm[level].plane_res_l = wm->wm[0].plane_res_l;
> - wm->wm[level].ignore_lines = wm->wm[0].ignore_lines;
> + wm_level = skl_plane_wm_level(crtc_state, plane_id,
> + 0, color_plane);
> + wm->wm[level].plane_res_b =
> + wm_level->plane_res_b;
> + wm->wm[level].plane_res_l =
> + wm_level->plane_res_l;
> + wm->wm[level].ignore_lines =
> + wm_level->ignore_lines;
I would suggest we want this to read something like:
const struct skl_wm_level *wm_level0 = skl_plane_wm_level(...)
wm_level->foo = wm_level0->foo;
...
And with those we can throw out the 'wm' variable from this loop as
well.
> }
> }
> }
> @@ -5358,8 +5397,13 @@ void skl_write_plane_wm(struct intel_plane *plane,
> &crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_uv[plane_id];
>
> for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> + const struct skl_wm_level *wm_level;
> + int color_plane = 0;
> +
> + wm_level = skl_plane_wm_level(crtc_state, plane_id, level, color_plane);
> +
> skl_write_wm_level(dev_priv, PLANE_WM(pipe, plane_id, level),
> - &wm->wm[level]);
> + wm_level);
> }
> skl_write_wm_level(dev_priv, PLANE_WM_TRANS(pipe, plane_id),
> &wm->trans_wm);
> @@ -5392,8 +5436,13 @@ void skl_write_cursor_wm(struct intel_plane *plane,
> &crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_y[plane_id];
>
> for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> + const struct skl_wm_level *wm_level;
> + int color_plane = 0;
> +
> + wm_level = skl_plane_wm_level(crtc_state, plane_id, level, color_plane);
> +
> skl_write_wm_level(dev_priv, CUR_WM(pipe, level),
> - &wm->wm[level]);
> + wm_level);
> }
> skl_write_wm_level(dev_priv, CUR_WM_TRANS(pipe), &wm->trans_wm);
>
> --
> 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list