[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/i915/display/fbc: Make fences a nice-to-have for GEN9+

Souza, Jose jose.souza at intel.com
Thu Mar 19 21:12:40 UTC 2020


On Wed, 2020-03-18 at 15:30 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 01:32:12AM +0000, Souza, Jose wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 19:26 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 05:42:30PM -0800, José Roberto de Souza
> > > wrote:
> > > > dGFX have local memory so it do not have aperture and do not
> > > > support
> > > > CPU fences but even for iGFX it have a small number of fences.
> > > > 
> > > > As replacement for fences to track frontbuffer modifications by
> > > > CPU
> > > > we have a software tracking that is already in used by FBC and
> > > > PSR.
> > > > PSR don't support fences so it shows that this tracking is
> > > > reliable.
> > > > 
> > > > So lets make fences a nice-to-have to activate FBC for GEN9+,
> > > > this
> > > > will allow us to enable FBC for dGFXs and iGFXs even when there
> > > > is
> > > > no
> > > > available fence.
> > > > 
> > > > We do not set fences to rotated planes but FBC only have
> > > > restrictions
> > > > against 16bpp, so adding it here.
> > > > 
> > > > Also adding a new check for the tiling format, fences are only
> > > > set
> > > > to X and Y tiled planes but again FBC don't have any
> > > > restrictions
> > > > against tiling so adding linear as supported as well, other
> > > > formats
> > > > should be added after tested but IGT only supports drawing in
> > > > thse
> > > > 3 formats.
> > > > 
> > > > intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen() maybe can also have the
> > > > same
> > > > treatment as fences but BSpec is not clear if the size
> > > > limitation
> > > > is
> > > > for hardware tracking or general use of FBC and I don't have a
> > > > 5K
> > > > display to test it, so keeping as is for safety.
> > > > 
> > > > v2:
> > > > - Added tiling and pixel format rotation checks
> > > > - Changed the GEN version not requiring fences to 11 from 9,
> > > > DDX
> > > > needs some changes but it don't have support for GEN11+
> > > > 
> > > > v3:
> > > > - Changed back to GEN9+
> > > > - Moved GEN test to inside of tiling_is_valid()
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 45
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h          |  1 +
> > > >  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > > > index 1d76e3646a25..a0d1d661a006 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > > > @@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static bool stride_is_valid(struct
> > > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > >  static bool pixel_format_is_valid(struct drm_i915_private
> > > > *dev_priv,
> > > > -				  u32 pixel_format)
> > > > +				  u32 pixel_format, unsigned
> > > > int
> > > > rotation)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	switch (pixel_format) {
> > > >  	case DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888:
> > > > @@ -599,6 +599,9 @@ static bool pixel_format_is_valid(struct
> > > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > >  		/* WaFbcOnly1to1Ratio:ctg */
> > > >  		if (IS_G4X(dev_priv))
> > > >  			return false;
> > > > +		if ((rotation & (DRM_MODE_ROTATE_90 |
> > > > DRM_MODE_ROTATE_270)) &&
> > > > +		    INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
> > > > +			return false;
> > > 
> > > Would still would prefer a rotations_is_valid() or some such
> > > thing.
> > 
> > Like this?
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > index 5e35c894bdf9..692edd45b769 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > @@ -600,15 +600,21 @@ static bool pixel_format_is_valid(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >                 /* WaFbcOnly1to1Ratio:ctg */
> >                 if (IS_G4X(dev_priv))
> >                         return false;
> > -               if ((rotation & (DRM_MODE_ROTATE_90 |
> > DRM_MODE_ROTATE_270)) &&
> > -                   INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
> > -                       return false;
> >                 return true;
> >         default:
> >                 return false;
> >         }
> >  }
> > 
> > +static bool rotations_is_valid(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > +                              u32 pixel_format, unsigned int
> > rotation)
> > +{
> > +       if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9 && pixel_format ==
> > DRM_FORMAT_RGB565 &&
> > +           rotation & (DRM_MODE_ROTATE_90 | DRM_MODE_ROTATE_270))
> 
> drm_rotation_90_or_270()

Done

> 
> > +               return false;
> > +       return true;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * For some reason, the hardware tracking starts looking at
> > whatever
> > we
> >   * programmed as the display plane base address register. It does
> > not
> > look at
> > @@ -810,6 +816,12 @@ static bool intel_fbc_can_activate(struct
> > intel_crtc *crtc)
> >                 return false;
> >         }
> > 
> > +       if (!rotations_is_valid(dev_priv, cache->fb.format->format,
> > +                               cache->plane.rotation)) {
> > +               fbc->no_fbc_reason = "plane rotation is invalid";
> > +               return false;
> > +       }
> 
> s/rotations/rotation/ + I'd move the pre-g4x rotation check into
> that function as well. With that

Done and done

> 
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

Thanks

> 
> > +
> >         if (cache->plane.pixel_blend_mode !=
> > DRM_MODE_BLEND_PIXEL_NONE
> > &&
> >             cache->fb.format->has_alpha) {
> >                 fbc->no_fbc_reason = "per-pixel alpha blending is
> > incompatible with FBC";
> > 
> > 
> > > >  		return true;
> > > >  	default:
> > > >  		return false;
> > > > @@ -639,6 +642,22 @@ static bool
> > > > intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > > >  	return effective_w <= max_w && effective_h <= max_h;
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > +static bool tiling_is_valid(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > > +			    uint64_t modifier)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	switch (modifier) {
> > > > +	case DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR:
> > > > +		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
> > > > +			return true;
> > > 
> > > Have we checked that eg. fbcon cursor still blinks correctly
> > > with FBC active and all?
> > 
> > Hum on fbcon FBC is enabled but it never compress, IGT tests with
> > fences complete disables are working fine, screen is updated when
> > tests
> > asks to with FBC enabled and compressing.
> > 
> > I will debug fbcon a little more to understand why it is never
> > compressing. 
> > 
> > > > +		return false;
> > > > +	case I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED:
> > > > +	case I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED:
> > > > +		return true;
> > > > +	default:
> > > > +		return false;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >  static void intel_fbc_update_state_cache(struct intel_crtc
> > > > *crtc,
> > > >  					 const struct
> > > > intel_crtc_state
> > > > *crtc_state,
> > > >  					 const struct
> > > > intel_plane_state
> > > > *plane_state)
> > > > @@ -672,6 +691,7 @@ static void
> > > > intel_fbc_update_state_cache(struct
> > > > intel_crtc *crtc,
> > > >  
> > > >  	cache->fb.format = fb->format;
> > > >  	cache->fb.stride = fb->pitches[0];
> > > > +	cache->fb.modifier = fb->modifier;
> > > >  
> > > >  	drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, plane_state->flags &
> > > > PLANE_HAS_FENCE &&
> > > >  		    !plane_state->vma->fence);
> > > > @@ -720,23 +740,33 @@ static bool intel_fbc_can_activate(struct
> > > > intel_crtc *crtc)
> > > >  		return false;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > > -	/* The use of a CPU fence is mandatory in order to
> > > > detect
> > > > writes
> > > > -	 * by the CPU to the scanout and trigger updates to the
> > > > FBC.
> > > > +	/* The use of a CPU fence is one of two ways to detect
> > > > writes
> > > > by the
> > > > +	 * CPU to the scanout and trigger updates to the FBC.
> > > > +	 *
> > > > +	 * The other method is by software tracking(see
> > > > +	 * intel_fbc_invalidate/flush()), it will manually
> > > > notify FBC
> > > > and nuke
> > > > +	 * the current compressed buffer and recompress it.
> > > >  	 *
> > > >  	 * Note that is possible for a tiled surface to be
> > > > unmappable
> > > > (and
> > > > -	 * so have no fence associated with it) due to aperture
> > > > constaints
> > > > +	 * so have no fence associated with it) due to aperture
> > > > constraints
> > > >  	 * at the time of pinning.
> > > >  	 *
> > > >  	 * FIXME with 90/270 degree rotation we should use the
> > > > fence on
> > > >  	 * the normal GTT view (the rotated view doesn't even
> > > > have a
> > > >  	 * fence). Would need changes to the FBC fence Y offset
> > > > as
> > > > well.
> > > > -	 * For now this will effecively disable FBC with 90/270
> > > > degree
> > > > +	 * For now this will effectively disable FBC with
> > > > 90/270 degree
> > > >  	 * rotation.
> > > >  	 */
> > > > -	if (cache->fence_id < 0) {
> > > > +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 9 && cache->fence_id < 0) {
> > > >  		fbc->no_fbc_reason = "framebuffer not tiled or
> > > > fenced";
> > > >  		return false;
> > > >  	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (!tiling_is_valid(dev_priv, cache->fb.modifier)) {
> > > > +		fbc->no_fbc_reason = "tiling unsupported";
> > > > +		return false;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > >  	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 4 && !IS_G4X(dev_priv) &&
> > > >  	    cache->plane.rotation != DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0) {
> > > >  		fbc->no_fbc_reason = "rotation unsupported";
> > > > @@ -748,7 +778,8 @@ static bool intel_fbc_can_activate(struct
> > > > intel_crtc *crtc)
> > > >  		return false;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > > -	if (!pixel_format_is_valid(dev_priv, cache->fb.format-
> > > > >format)) 
> > > > {
> > > > +	if (!pixel_format_is_valid(dev_priv, cache->fb.format-
> > > > >format,
> > > > +				   cache->plane.rotation)) {
> > > >  		fbc->no_fbc_reason = "pixel format is invalid";
> > > >  		return false;
> > > >  	}
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > index 3330b538d379..bf88663d8217 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > > @@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ struct intel_fbc {
> > > >  		struct {
> > > >  			const struct drm_format_info *format;
> > > >  			unsigned int stride;
> > > > +			u64 modifier;
> > > >  		} fb;
> > > >  		u16 gen9_wa_cfb_stride;
> > > >  		s8 fence_id;
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.25.1


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list