[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915: Introduce scaling filter related registers and bit fields.

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 03:51:01PM +0530, Pankaj Bharadiya wrote:
> Introduce scaler registers and bit fields needed to configure the
> scaling filter in prgrammed mode and configure scaling filter
> coefficients.
> 
> changes since v1:
> * None
> changes since RFC:
> * Parametrize scaler coeffient macros by 'set' (Ville)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 9c53fe918be6..d40f12d2a6b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -7205,6 +7205,7 @@ enum {
>  #define PS_PLANE_SEL(plane) (((plane) + 1) << 25)
>  #define PS_FILTER_MASK         (3 << 23)
>  #define PS_FILTER_MEDIUM       (0 << 23)
> +#define PS_FILTER_PROGRAMMED   (1 << 23)
>  #define PS_FILTER_EDGE_ENHANCE (2 << 23)
>  #define PS_FILTER_BILINEAR     (3 << 23)
>  #define PS_VERT3TAP            (1 << 21)
> @@ -7219,6 +7220,10 @@ enum {
>  #define PS_VADAPT_MODE_MOST_ADAPT  (3 << 5)
>  #define PS_PLANE_Y_SEL_MASK  (7 << 5)
>  #define PS_PLANE_Y_SEL(plane) (((plane) + 1) << 5)
> +#define PS_Y_VERT_FILTER_SELECT(set)   ((set) << 4)
> +#define PS_Y_HORZ_FILTER_SELECT(set)   ((set) << 3)
> +#define PS_UV_VERT_FILTER_SELECT(set)  ((set) << 2)
> +#define PS_UV_HORZ_FILTER_SELECT(set)  ((set) << 1)
>  
>  #define _PS_PWR_GATE_1A     0x68160
>  #define _PS_PWR_GATE_2A     0x68260
> @@ -7281,6 +7286,25 @@ enum {
>  #define _PS_ECC_STAT_2B     0x68AD0
>  #define _PS_ECC_STAT_1C     0x691D0
>  
> +#define _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1A	   0x68198
> +#define _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2A	   0x68298
> +#define _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1B	   0x68998
> +#define _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2B	   0x68A98
> +#define _PS_COEF_SET1_INDEX_1A	   0x681A0
> +#define _PS_COEF_SET1_INDEX_2A	   0x682A0
> +#define _PS_COEF_SET1_INDEX_1B	   0x689A0
> +#define _PS_COEF_SET1_INDEX_2B	   0x68AA0
> +#define PS_COEE_INDEX_AUTO_INC	   (1 << 10)
> +
> +#define _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1A	   0x6819C
> +#define _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2A	   0x6829C
> +#define _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1B	   0x6899C
> +#define _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2B	   0x68A9C
> +#define _PS_COEF_SET1_DATA_1A	   0x681A4
> +#define _PS_COEF_SET1_DATA_2A	   0x682A4
> +#define _PS_COEF_SET1_DATA_1B	   0x689A4
> +#define _PS_COEF_SET1_DATA_2B	   0x68AA4
> +
>  #define _ID(id, a, b) _PICK_EVEN(id, a, b)
>  #define SKL_PS_CTRL(pipe, id) _MMIO_PIPE(pipe,        \
>  			_ID(id, _PS_1A_CTRL, _PS_2A_CTRL),       \
> @@ -7310,6 +7334,30 @@ enum {
>  			_ID(id, _PS_ECC_STAT_1A, _PS_ECC_STAT_2A),   \
>  			_ID(id, _PS_ECC_STAT_1B, _PS_ECC_STAT_2B))
>  
> +#define _SKL_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET0(pipe, id)  _ID(pipe,    \
> +			_ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1A, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2A), \
> +			_ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1B, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2B))
> +
> +#define _SKL_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET1(pipe, id)  _ID(pipe,    \
> +			_ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET1_INDEX_1A, _PS_COEF_SET1_INDEX_2A), \
> +			_ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET1_INDEX_1B, _PS_COEF_SET1_INDEX_2B))
> +
> +#define _SKL_PS_COEF_DATA_SET0(pipe, id)  _ID(pipe,     \
> +			_ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1A, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2A), \
> +			_ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1B, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2B))
> +
> +#define _SKL_PS_COEF_DATA_SET1(pipe, id)  _ID(pipe,     \
> +			_ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET1_DATA_1A, _PS_COEF_SET1_DATA_2A), \
> +			_ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET1_DATA_1B, _PS_COEF_SET1_DATA_2B))
> +
> +#define SKL_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET(pipe, id, set) \
> +			_MMIO_PIPE(set, _SKL_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET0(pipe, id), \
> +			    _SKL_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET1(pipe, id))
> +
> +#define SKL_PS_COEF_DATA_SET(pipe, id, set) \
> +			_MMIO_PIPE(set, _SKL_PS_COEF_DATA_SET0(pipe, id), \
> +			    _SKL_PS_COEF_DATA_SET1(pipe, id))

I'd name those CNL_PS_COEF_{DATA,INDEX}(). Or maybe eeven GLK_ since it
already has this despite not being officially supported.

Also I'd probably just have used +(set)*8 instead of adding another trip
through _PICK_EVEN(). It's getting a bit hard to read this.

> +
>  /* legacy palette */
>  #define _LGC_PALETTE_A           0x4a000
>  #define _LGC_PALETTE_B           0x4a800
> -- 
> 2.23.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel