[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Allow for different modes of interruptible i915_active_wait

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Mar 30 17:20:09 UTC 2020


Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2020-03-30 17:07:34)
> Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> 
> > Allow some users the discretion to not immediately return on a normal
> > signal. Hopefully, they will opt to use TASK_KILLABLE instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c           |  6 ++++--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h           |  6 +++++-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_active.c | 10 +++++-----
> >  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > index a0d31f7bfb42..7b685032cc1e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
> > @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static int flush_lazy_signals(struct i915_active *ref)
> >       return err;
> >  }
> >  
> > -int i915_active_wait(struct i915_active *ref)
> > +int __i915_active_wait(struct i915_active *ref, int state)
> >  {
> >       int err;
> 
> minor gripe: s/state/task_state

set_current_state()
signal_pending_state()

All locals refer to it as state :)
-Chris


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list